a TERABYTE! |
Author: |
Message: |
benellis2007
Junior Member
'Brainz'
Posts: 64
34 / / –
Joined: Mar 2005
|
O.P. a TERABYTE!
1000gb on the size of a dvd disk, it must be impossible i read this on the internet, but how?
check them out. read it its amaizing. i wonder how much they will cost lol
http://www.physorg.com/news1333.htmlt
|
|
03-20-2005 08:26 PM |
|
|
mwe99
Veteran Member
Posts: 2514 Reputation: 67
36 / /
Joined: Jul 2004
|
RE: a TERABYTE!
Wow thats gonna have to cost like £250 +, but a great idea though
|
|
03-20-2005 08:28 PM |
|
|
benellis2007
Junior Member
'Brainz'
Posts: 64
34 / / –
Joined: Mar 2005
|
O.P. RE: a TERABYTE!
yeh have you looked at the site
|
|
03-20-2005 08:30 PM |
|
|
Plik
Veteran Member
Posts: 1489 Reputation: 46
35 / / –
Joined: Jun 2004
|
RE: a TERABYTE!
read write acces times would most likely suck
|
|
03-20-2005 08:31 PM |
|
|
mwe99
Veteran Member
Posts: 2514 Reputation: 67
36 / /
Joined: Jul 2004
|
RE: a TERABYTE!
Yep i did do i wonder if anyone would buy it though and plus would it even be a RW one
|
|
03-20-2005 08:32 PM |
|
|
paperless
Veteran Member
Saved by the bell
Posts: 1113 Reputation: 37
35 / /
Joined: Apr 2003
Status: Away
|
RE: a TERABYTE!
Maybe if you use X-Ray beams to burn on the disks..or even gamma ray but gama ray disks would have waaaaaaaaaaay more capacity than a TB.
|
|
03-20-2005 09:12 PM |
|
|
user27089
Disabled Account
Posts: 6321
Joined: Nov 2003
Status: Away
|
RE: a TERABYTE!
There have been many threads like this before, a while back, its old news really... its pretty interesting though... they're going to cost loads when they first go on market, I mean, the writers will be like .
|
|
03-20-2005 09:13 PM |
|
|
paperless
Veteran Member
Saved by the bell
Posts: 1113 Reputation: 37
35 / /
Joined: Apr 2003
Status: Away
|
RE: a TERABYTE!
quote: Originally posted by traxor
There have been many threads like this before, a while back, its old news really... its pretty interesting though... they're going to cost loads when they first go on market, I mean, the writers will be like .
The last thread about this was about blu-ray which is only some gigabytes.
And yeah i think the burners will be a bit expensive like the DVD burners were but give it sometime. The blank disks i dont think will be exensive
|
|
03-20-2005 09:16 PM |
|
|
ddunk
Veteran Member
Posts: 1228 Reputation: 51
35 / /
Joined: Mar 2004
|
RE: a TERABYTE!
quote: The future of DVD is still unclear, but what is certain is that a replacement is already needed and looked upon. And the favorite candidates seem to be Blu-Ray and HD-DVD. But things are far from being settled yet, as far as these two formats are concerned.
A real battle or beforehand publicity?
Although it will take a while till they become largely accessible - probably towards the end of 2005, but most likely in 2006 - the formats believed to replace the DVD generated several debates and the last CES (Consumer & Electronics Show) only proved that the two discs are really at war.
Besides, if you're looking for information on Blu-Ray and HD-DVD, the first data you are most likely to obtain would be who's backing one format or the other, or who is undecided yet. Oh, and maybe the promised storage capacity for each format.
If you're to confide in this data, then Blu-Ray promises 25 GB for single-layer and 50 GB for dual-layer, compared to HD-DVD's 15 GB for single-layer and 30 GB for dual-layer, and it's backed by the most important audio-video entertainment and IT companies, so we have a winner... Then why is there a battle, and, most importantly, is it really necessary?
The answer is yes! The battle is inevitable, and it's not necessary about who is going to sell more units or who is going to get more popular, it's about information control.
More at Sofpedia
The article also mentions the new TB discs.
|
|
03-20-2005 09:18 PM |
|
|
saralk
Veteran Member
Posts: 2598 Reputation: 38
35 / /
Joined: Feb 2003
|
RE: a TERABYTE!
isnt a terrabyte 1024gb?
The Artist Formerly Known As saralk
London · New York · Paris
Est. 1989
|
|
03-20-2005 09:22 PM |
|
|
Pages: (3):
« First
[ 1 ]
2
3
»
Last »
|
|