Shoutbox

i still think that its the msn handwriting because i also got that many errors and msn crashed

quote:

---

Originally posted by lizard.boy
i still think that its the msn handwriting because i also got that many errors and msn crashed

---

We are talking about the forums and the handwriting plugin's worlds apart

i know that thats why i think your all wrong. i doubt that the js scropt for the advitars is messing it up. but i did get that same thing happening with msn handwriting w/e ignore me then

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mnjul
We are talking about the forums and the handwriting plugin's worlds apart

---

But the errors could have come from something else... just stole the focus from IE...

I think billy should've pressed Yes and see what on earth was going on

quote:

---

Originally posted by ---+[Matty]+---
Just realized how he can prevent it...

Tools > Internet Options > Advanced > Check Disable Script Debugging
as well as
Uncheck Display a notification about every script error

---

But before he does that, he should try the debug thing and post the results, so I'll know what's wrong with the script...

Edit: Argh... I just went into IE6 and did the reverse of what you said, and there's still no error.

To take WDZ of the hook, it can't be the javascript, that's for sure.
A) Javascript doesn't give runtime errors.
B) If there was an error in javascript, the errorline would be from the script, and there aren't 339 lines in any script used when viewing threads.

There is nothing wrong with the (X)HTML of the threads...

quote:

---

Originally posted by CookieRevised
B) If there was an error in javascript, the errorline would be from the script, and there aren't 339 lines in any script used when viewing threads.

---

MyBB's HTML output for a thread can have that many lines though... what if the error occurs when my resize function is called from the <img> tag?

quote:

---

There is nothing wrong with the HTML of the threads...

---

I'm sure if you tried the W3C validator on it, there would be hundreds of errors...

[eh, could-be-spam-though-I-say-it-is-not-really]

quote:

---

Originally posted by WDZ
I'm sure if you tried the W3C validator on it, there would be hundreds of errors...

---

Blah, that asks for a try

This page is not Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional!
Anyone wanna guess the number of errors before they click the link?

[/eh, could-be-spam-though-I-say-it-is-not-really]