Shoutbox

Enough?
He was just explaining who really created that, since you said

quote:

---

The Function patch was made by me not by Cookie.

---

wich turned out to be a misunderstanding from both parts.

quote:

---

Originally posted by blessedguy
Enough?
He was just explaining who really created that, since you said

wich turned out to be a misunderstanding from both parts.

---

Well but i had already explained that misunderstanding in a previous post so there was no reason to continue.I explained clearly that copying his code and put it in a function or copying the function is the same thing(in both cases he has the merit).So i don't know why he continues to say i lie because seeing the facts i really have no reasons to do that

ok, let me explain _why_ I replied.

The first time I replied because you said:
"The Function patch was made by me, not by Cookie."...
Which is wrong and thus I replied because that Patch() function does come literally out of my scripts, word for word.

The second time I replied was because you said you thought you copied the patch() code out of the 'Idle on demand' script.
Although that script was probably used as a base, I simply suggested that the actual Patch() code which is used in this 'Disable PhotoSharing' script and in your 'NudgesToolScript' script comes from the 'Unlimited Nudges' script, not from 'Idle on demand' script. The 'Idle on Demand' script uses a slightly different Patch() function.

The two things above can easly be verified by anyone by downloading those old scripts.

I never called you a liar and/or never intended to call you a liar, sorry if that seemed so.
In fact, I do respect you (and you can verify that by asking other people how I feel about you) because I know you would not copy code without crediting and because I know you know your stuff... I simply wanted to correct those two things you've said, I don't see what's so arrogant about that...

I have to admit at the facts that the functions are really the same,but well when i replied i was sure i wrote that function(to be honest i'm still sure).Comparing the code it seems you are right,but well actually that's no important because in both of the cases i don't see the difference:copying the function or your code and put it in a function for me is the same thing.That's why i didn't understand why you had to continue.However to talk about the script someone could be find interest that page ..Well i really think the author just copied all stuff.

Think i just found a bug in the script, i had restarted my wlm and it said that photosharing was disabled but when i sent a file it used photosharing.

to fix it i had to "enable" and "disable" again... just thought you should know

quote:

---

Originally posted by NanaFreak
Think i just found a bug in the script, i had restarted my wlm and it said that photosharing was disabled but when i sent a file it used photosharing.

to fix it i had to "enable" and "disable" again... just thought you should know

---

Where did it say it was enabled?

Because there is nothing in the script which tells the user if it was enabled or not. Except in 2 places:

1) When you actually click on the submenu "enable" or "disable" to enable or disable it. So maybe you were a bit confused for a split second and saw "enable" and thought it meant the script was enabled. But remember that this menu says the opposite of what the current state is.

2) After clicking the above menu you will see a toast popping up telling if the function has been enabled or disabled. But that can only be seen when you actually click on the menu, not after a WLM restart.

yea i think i was confused about that... but i think the script should re-enable after messenger restarts...

Hang on.

You are 100% correct, there is indeed a big bug there.

The script does not re-enable or disable anything when it is restarted but it does get the current setting from the registry. This means there is a big inconsistancy between the two and you will end up needing to enable or disable it before it would work each time you start it (aka, each time you start Messenger).

You get that when you copy stuff and changing a few things without understanding it

So... what does this do, and doesn't even work? Given all the discussion about stolen code, copied code, not understanding the code, bugs... not sure what the status of this script is in terms of working or not.

Secondly, again, what does it do? Does it disable the automatic "Photo Sharing" when you drag and drop an image into the window, instead sending it like a file, or...?

You can read what it does here:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mnjul

quote:

---

Originally posted by NanaFreak
but i prefer it if i could totally delete the photosharing instead of just for print screens...

---

iirc shouldn't this patching stop all the photosharing thing, instead of just print screens (which Patchou's registry does?)

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mnjul

quote:

---

Originally posted by TheGuruSupremacy
I assume that at least the byte to patch is your own work.

---

No, I presume? <=click link to know what this specific patch address does

---