What happened to the Messenger Plus! forums on msghelp.net?
Shoutbox » MsgHelp Archive » Skype & Technology » Tech Talk » New system

Pages: (2): « First « 1 [ 2 ] Last »
New system
Author: Message:
ipab
Veteran Member
*****

Avatar
Design Evolved

Posts: 1017
Reputation: 32
35 / Male / Flag
Joined: May 2004
RE: New system
I'm curious about the 10000RPM drive, does it really give that much of an advantage over standard optical drives? I was thinking of going for 3TB and it's not cheap to get that amount in 10000RPM...
56656E692C 20566964692C 2056696369
06-10-2009 01:01 AM
Profile E-Mail PM Web Find Quote Report
prashker
Veteran Member
*****


Posts: 5109
Reputation: 104
– / Male / –
Joined: Mar 2005
Status: Away
RE: New system
That's generally not the idea when you get a 10000RPM drive, put stuff you want to generally load faster on it (aka Windows Files, Programs, etc).

Music, Movies etc can go on a slower drive.
06-10-2009 01:06 AM
Profile PM Find Quote Report
Menthix
forum admin
*******

Avatar

Posts: 5537
Reputation: 102
40 / Male / Flag
Joined: Mar 2002
RE: New system
quote:
Originally posted by ipab
does it really give that much of an advantage over standard optical drives?
Standard 7200RPM harddisks (magnetic) you mean?

It all depends on the benchmarks. Even a big 5400RPM drive could in theory outperform a smaller 10000RPM drive these days. The bytes you fit on a platter, the closer the bytes are together (areal density). This makes seek times faster, sometimes faster than a smaller disk on a higher RPM.
Finish the problem
Menthix.net | Contact Me
06-10-2009 10:13 AM
Profile E-Mail PM Web Find Quote Report
Adeptus
Senior Member
****


Posts: 732
Reputation: 40
Joined: Oct 2005
RE: New system
quote:
Originally posted by Menthix
It all depends on the benchmarks. Even a big 5400RPM drive could in theory outperform a smaller 10000RPM drive these days. The bytes you fit on a platter, the closer the bytes are together (areal density). This makes seek times faster, sometimes faster than a smaller disk on a higher RPM.
The higher aerial density can result in similar or even greater sustained throughput, which is one performance criteria for hard drives.  On the other hand, higher rpm drives will continue to lead for the average random seek time, the other key performance criteria. 

This is because of lower rotational latency and is easy to understand.  If the head is positioned just past where you need it, the platter will have to complete a full revolution before the data can be read or written.  A higher rpm drive will always complete the revolution faster than a lower rpm drive, regardless of aerial density.

While the throughput can make up for slower random seek times in synthetic benchmarks that try to quantify the performance of the drive as one number, it is still generally a good idea to use higher rpm drives for volumes with random access patterns, such as system volumes and databases.  Lower rpm high capacity, high aerial density drives are best suited for file storage, particularly large files like video.

06-10-2009 04:06 PM
Profile E-Mail PM Find Quote Report
Pages: (2): « First « 1 [ 2 ] Last »
« Next Oldest Return to Top Next Newest »


Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
View a Printable Version
Send this Thread to a Friend
Subscribe | Add to Favorites
Rate This Thread:

Forum Jump:

Forum Rules:
You cannot post new threads
You cannot post replies
You cannot post attachments
You can edit your posts
HTML is Off
myCode is On
Smilies are On
[img] Code is On