Shoutbox

quote:

---

Originally posted by ahmetgns
Actually I couldn't see even one Plus! logo there.

---

top left, its really faint and really large

quote:

---

Originally posted by NanaFreak

quote:

---

Originally posted by ahmetgns
Actually I couldn't see even one Plus! logo there.

---

top left, its really faint and really large

---

Where?



This is the first 250x250 pixel part of the "game grid".

here:

oh yeah, I could never see it without your indicator, thanks

quote:

---

Originally posted by PCBEEF
statistically you'd have to spend 2.7 hours continuously playing the game before you'll win one prize. That's assuming theres 250 prizes to begin with and each request takes 5 seconds.

---

You cannot calculate it statistically but you can calculate it probabilitally, of course unless you have got the Patchou's statistics since the beginning of the contest.

hello. i have a question... yesterday, when the contest began, my friend and i clicked on each other's referral link. later i won something, and after i sent my details he won too, by referral. then he sent his details too for the prize, and continued playing, but i went to bed. this morning i woke up and that red star said i had one a prize too. so i sent my request again, but later found out that my friend hadn't won a prize again during the night, as i thought...
i'm pretty sure no one else clicked my referral link and started playing, so it must have been because of my firend's prize, already won by referral. does this mean our prizes could be annuled or something?
just asking because i am not interested in cheating here, just want to play the game and win something if possible.
someone please answer. thanks.

But my calculation doesn't reflect your results:

769x703/250x5/3600=3.003 hours

How is your calculation?

quote:

---

Originally posted by Eddie
So this means for the last few weeks that official testers have been sending out there referral links they have probably lined up a fair few possibilities of scoring prizes.

---

No, they wouldn't... The ref links were not valid and not recorded until the official start of the contest...

So, in fact, those testers who had a ref link somewhere actually have less chances now!!!!

Because if people clicked on it before the start of the contest, they would simply be redirected to the download page. This means that the tester would have lost a potential 'client' because those who clicked that link would already have Plus! downloaded and wouldn't download it again (during the contest)...

quote:

---

Originally posted by CookieRevised

quote:

---

Originally posted by Eddie
So this means for the last few weeks that official testers have been sending out there referral links they have probably lined up a fair few possibilities of scoring prizes.

---

No, they wouldn't... The ref links were not valid and not recorded until the official start of the contest...

So, in fact, those testers who had a ref link somewhere actually have less chances now!!!!

Because if people clicked on it before the start of the contest, they would simply be redirected to the download page. This means that the tester would have lost a potential 'client' because those who clicked that link would already have Plus! downloaded and wouldn't download it again (during the contest)...

---

I remember clicking a few of these links, all of which never redirected (based on the url), but if you say they didn't count then okay i suppose, i still thinks its dodgy though.

quote:

---

Originally posted by ahmetgns
769x703

---

its actually 740x704... and you have to include the 0 row and column