[bug] attachment and/or noparse - Printable Version
-Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net)
+-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58)
+--- Forum: General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=11)
+---- Forum: Forum & Website (/forumdisplay.php?fid=13)
+----- Thread: [bug] attachment and/or noparse (/showthread.php?tid=29050)
[bug] attachment and/or noparse by CookieRevised on 07-23-2004 at 05:24 PM
when you make a post with an attachment and you type:
[noparse][attchment][/noparse]
the [attchment] is still replaced with the attachmentlink....
PS: the use you might ask? see http://shoutbox.menthix.net/showthread.php?tid=28...d=281659#pid281659 
RE: [bug] attachment and/or noparse by Choli on 07-24-2004 at 11:58 AM
the [attachment], [thread] and [post] tags are replaced before doing anything else when parsing posts, and the result of that parsing is stored in the db, rather than the tags theirselves. That's why the [noparse] tag can't handle them.
A similar thing happens with /me and /slap commands, however they are stored in the db.
RE: [bug] attachment and/or noparse by Guido on 07-24-2004 at 01:11 PM
[thread]
[post]
//edit// What are [ thread ] and [ post ] supposed to do? 
They weren't replaced above... 
RE: [bug] attachment and/or noparse by CookieRevised on 07-24-2004 at 01:49 PM
[post=http://shoutbox.menthix.net/showthread.php?tid=29050&pid=281865#pid281865] gives:
Guido's reply to [bug] attachment and/or noparse
same with [thread=....]
RE: [bug] attachment and/or noparse by Choli on 07-24-2004 at 02:44 PM
quote:Guido: You can also use the [post=281865] syntax. The same for [thread]
Originally posted by CookieRevised
[post=http://shoutbox.menthix.net/showthread.php?tid=29050&pid=281865#pid281865]
RE: [bug] attachment and/or noparse by Guido on 07-24-2004 at 03:22 PM
quote:Thought so
Originally posted by Choli
Guido: You can also use the Guido's reply to [bug] attachment and/or noparse syntax. The same for [thread]
, I remember when we asked for them But as you used them without anything, [thread] and [post], I wondered what did you mean.
Thanks
RE: [bug] attachment and/or noparse by Choli on 07-24-2004 at 04:31 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Guido
But as you used them without anything, [thread] and [post], I wondered what did you mean.
I used them without anything to refer to them, it was the same as if i say: the [quote] tag is used for bla bla bla...
RE: [bug] attachment and/or noparse by WDZ on 07-25-2004 at 03:11 AM
It's a well-known fact that [noparse] is not perfect, and I never said it was.
Limitations 