See this webpage.
It has a javascript which for me predicts correctly most of the time. Ive tried this atleast 500 times out of which it is rite 425 or so times.
Can some one say how this is done ??
Click here to c that page (works only in ie) Damn
I dunno if it'll work cause i havent tried it. i mean th link cause i just uploaded it 2 my server.
If ur not using ie click here and download zip file. then open with ie.

Error :

quote:

---

Originally posted by John Anderton
See this webpage.
It has a javascript which for me predicts correctly most of the time. Ive tried this atleast 500 times out of which it is rite 425 or so times.
Can some one say how this is done ??
Click here to c that page
I dunno if it'll work cause i havent tried it. i mean th link cause i just uploaded it 2 my server.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Carltos Cool
Error

---

K then no problem i'll cehck it out now.

Edit : whoa freeky lol.

quote:

---

This file is made by John Anderton

All Rights Reserved To Scion Technologies®.

Copyright © 2004 - 2005

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by John Anderton
Dont steal stuff from sites and take credit for them dude

---

It's simple , It's always the same , not 425 of 500 , Then you must have calculated wrong...

Do it like this...

18 - 1 - 8 = 9, Now look at that symbol, then look diagonal, all the same symbols

And it's bad you stole it

isn't it just that most people have the pointer over the certain squar when doing it... it prolly detects that the pointer is hovering there for ages or something... cause I got a dot... and thats not what I was thinking as far as I remember ...

no its not, its because there are only a limited amount of numbers that can be made by doing this, so the script just puts the same character for those numbers.

quote:

---

Originally posted by saralk
no its not, its because there are only a limited amount of numbers that can be made by doing this, so the script just puts the same character for those numbers.

---

Hmmm, if you substract the second number, you basicly round down to the lowest ten,
after that you substract one more, so basicly this are the only values you can get:
10 -> 9
20 -> 18
30 -> 27
40 -> 36
50 -> 45
60 -> 54
70 -> 63
80 -> 72
90 -> 81
(all multiples of 9 )
If you look closely, you will see that those numbers always have the same symbol, the other numbers that can not be obtained are simply there to distract you,
the program picks a symbol, puts it in all the predefined numbers, and fills the rest with bullshit. once you click the magic square, it displays the symbol it chose

more proof:

hey...u only got 3 right on me in about 15 shots......wich is 20 per cent...that's bad ...btw it wasnt done by u 4 sure...

quote:

---

Originally posted by johny
hey...u only got 3 right on me in about 15 shots......wich is 20 per cent...that's bad ...btw it wasnt done by u 4 sure...

---

it missed me.. my number was 99

99 would be impossible to get

99 is the highest two digit number, therefore it would be impossible to get anything with that answer of 99 without using a three digit number. Which wasn’t allowed

quote:

---

Originally posted by madman66
99 would be impossible to get

99 is the highest two digit number, therefore it would be impossible to get anything with that answer of 99 without using a three digit number. Which wasn’t allowed

---

John Anderton, how in the hell can you take a webpage that you have no idea how it works and add a line saying YOU made it? Is there something wrong with your brain or what?

Hey i didnt mean to rip it. I found it like years ago when i knew nothing and that time i did all that for fun and i 4got to change it man. I had just done that for fun cause i was trying to find how it was doing it. So i had edited it a long time ago. I just 4 got to change it. Wait ill delete it.

Now, as we just are on this topic of "stealing";
When I first visited your forum at sciontech.freefronthost.com/, John, I noticed that they have the rather strange name "Scion Technologies". I then got on Google, googled for Scion technologies and guess what, some sites came up, linking me to the url www.sciontechnologies.com/, which belongs to a company named Scion Technologies.
I'm not saying you "stole" that name on purpose, but I fear that using this name for your forum could violate their rights and could get you in quite some trouble.

quote:

---

Originally posted by John Anderton
Dont steal stuff from sites and take credit for them dude

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by John Anderton
Hey i didnt mean to rip it. I found it like years ago when i knew nothing and that time i did all that for fun and i 4got to change it man. I had just done that for fun cause i was trying to find how it was doing it. So i had edited it a long time ago. I just 4 got to change it. Wait ill delete it.

---

quote:

---

Copyright © 2004 - 2005

---

http://sciontech.freefronthost.com/member.php?act...d=lastposter&fid=9



u stole iit on purpose didnt you?

There says you are registered since 16/1 and on the page of the mind reader there is copyright 2004-2005 why lie?

There says the copyrifht is of scion technologies... shame on you! nvm that part

algebra time!

where x and y are integers between 1 and 9:

stage 1 = 10x + y
stage 2 = 10x + y - 9x - y
stage 2 = 9x

Oh look!  All the multiples of 9 are the same icon!

quote:

---

Originally posted by fluffy_lobster


algebra time!

where x and y are integers between 1 and 9:

stage 1 = 10x + y
stage 2 = 10x + y - 9x - y
stage 2 = 9x

Oh look!  All the multiples of 9 are the same icon!

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by saralk

quote:

---

Originally posted by fluffy_lobster


algebra time!

where x and y are integers between 1 and 9:

stage 1 = 10x + y
stage 2 = 10x + y - 9x - y
stage 2 = 9x

Oh look!  All the multiples of 9 are the same icon!

---

isnt 10x + y - 9x - y = x, not 9x?

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by traxor
Feckin Integers, there was sumit about that integer crap in an exam today... i missed the question out ...

---

John Anderton = owned