Shoutbox

Reloader Source ? - Printable Version

-Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net)
+-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58)
+--- Forum: Messenger Plus! for Live Messenger (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+---- Forum: Scripting (/forumdisplay.php?fid=39)
+----- Forum: Plug-Ins (/forumdisplay.php?fid=28)
+------ Thread: Reloader Source ? (/showthread.php?tid=50912)

Reloader Source ? by TazDevil on 09-25-2005 at 01:20 PM

would it be possible that TB could attach me the source code of the Reloaded plugin ? the one with the messagebox ???

- i would like to export the function so that it can be used not only from IM windows but from other plugins as well
- and also add a shortcut key

PS with full credits to him ofcourse

thanks in advance :)


RE: Reloader Source ? by absorbation on 09-25-2005 at 01:23 PM

TB does'nt visit here much plus the best way to contact him is via e-mail :) and you have it a belive as your installer script is by him ;)


RE: Reloader Source ? by TazDevil on 09-25-2005 at 01:29 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Absorbation
TB does'nt visit here much plus the best way to contact him is via e-mail :) and you have it a belive as your installer script is by him ;)
hehe yes my installer is from him (help me a lot i didnt know jack about NSIS), but i dont have his email

could you pm it to me plz ?
RE: Reloader Source ? by Dempsey on 09-25-2005 at 01:32 PM

Well then you already have the reloader source code, its in the insatller.  Its only a couple of lines, it uses SendMessage to send the reload message to Messenger Plus!


RE: Reloader Source ? by TazDevil on 09-25-2005 at 01:39 PM

Yes i know i have it in the installer, but i want t accoplish the messagebox effect as plus! will reload the plugins after 5 seconds
TB's plugin will not reload the plugins until the messagebox is closed
:S


RE: Reloader Source ? by Sypher on 09-25-2005 at 01:45 PM

I informed TB to have a look at this post :)


RE: Reloader Source ? by TazDevil on 09-25-2005 at 01:47 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Sypher
I informed TB to have a look at this post :)
Cheers
RE: Reloader Source ? by TheBlasphemer on 09-25-2005 at 04:03 PM

No


RE: Reloader Source ? by TazDevil on 09-25-2005 at 04:07 PM

quote:
Originally posted by TheBlasphemer
No
k, thanks for your time :)
RE: Reloader Source ? by ipab on 09-25-2005 at 05:14 PM

o come on TB be nice :P

I could do it for you.


RE: Reloader Source ? by TazDevil on 09-25-2005 at 05:30 PM

quote:
Originally posted by ipab
o come on TB be nice :P

I could do it for you. This is just NSIS right?
no its ok the installer is fine,  its the plugin code i wanted, but i will write it my self :)
RE: RE: Reloader Source ? by CookieRevised on 09-25-2005 at 10:17 PM

quote:
Originally posted by TazDevil
Yes i know i have it in the installer, but i want t accoplish the messagebox effect as plus! will reload the plugins after 5 seconds
TB's plugin will not reload the plugins until the messagebox is closed
:S

Simply don't reload the plugins until the user has clicked ok on the messagebox, it's that simple...

instead of:
   ReloadPlugins
   MsgBox "click here"
do:
   MsgBox "click here"
   ReloadPlugins

RE: Reloader Source ? by TazDevil on 09-25-2005 at 10:29 PM

quote:
Originally posted by CookieRevised
Simply don't reload the plugins until the user has clicked ok on the messagebox, it's that simple...

instead of:
   ReloadPlugins
   MsgBox "click here"
do:
   MsgBox "click here"
   ReloadPlugins
The idea is to unload all plugins including the caller one for updating  or any other reason... so the command must be called from another dll that is not a plus pluginsto that Plus! will not unload it, when the command is called...

I have examined TB's plugin and fould an embeded plugin inside which is used to produce the nice message i wanted all along :)

So i can say that i have accomplished my objective :)
RE: Reloader Source ? by RaceProUK on 09-26-2005 at 12:41 PM

quote:
Originally posted by TazDevil
I have examined TB's plugin and fould an embeded plugin inside which is used to produce the nice message i wanted all along :)
Can you get to it using PE Explorer or similar?
RE: Reloader Source ? by TazDevil on 09-26-2005 at 12:52 PM

quote:
Originally posted by raceprouk
Can you get to it using PE Explorer or similar?
with ResHack yes... it is a resource
RE: Reloader Source ? by TheBlasphemer on 09-26-2005 at 02:54 PM

If you want to do it that way, go along, just don't expect me to do anything for you ever again in the future.


RE: Reloader Source ? by TazDevil on 09-26-2005 at 05:23 PM

Really i wouldnt like to fuel the situation, nor pick a fight, but,

Well if you look at the fist post i think i asked it really nicely, and your nicest reply was

quote:
Originally posted by TheBlasphemer
No
and i wouldnt think that, that was your greatest accomplishment, as i said i could do it my self BUT foolish me i wanted to enhance your plugin, and being that your plugin is majorly used by developers, i thought it was a mischief to work OnLY when you are online AND have an online contact to send the message, that is very restrictive, so i dfecided to write a workaround to remove this restriction, and if you feel so strongly about it, then i will write the whole file from scratch...

since i didnt have any code i couldnt steal it, i reverse engineered it.
As i said repeatedly i am thankfull for your help and that wasnt my intention all along, and i deeply regret for ever asking this

Whatever you decide, you are still in the credits of my plugin for all the help you have given to me and other members upto now :)

Now peace...
RE: RE: Reloader Source ? by CookieRevised on 09-27-2005 at 05:46 AM

some notes...

quote:
Originally posted by TazDevil
Really i wouldnt like to fuel the situation, nor pick a fight, but,

Well if you look at the fist post i think i asked it really nicely, and your nicest reply was
quote:
Originally posted by TheBlasphemer
No
and i wouldnt think that, that was your greatest accomplishment, as i said i could do it my self BUT foolish me i wanted to enhance your plugin, and being that your plugin is majorly used by developers, i thought it was a mischief to work OnLY when you are online AND have an online contact to send the message, that is very restrictive, so i dfecided to write a workaround to remove this restriction, and if you feel so strongly about it, then i will write the whole file from scratch...
It is a common use that you don't touch other people's programs, even if the intensions are good. You ask it first and you state what you wanna do with it. I don't know about what is being asked in private or what not, but maybe if you explained what you wanted to do (like you just did), his reaction would have been different ;)

If an original author doesn't want you to play with/enhance his programs that should be respected...

quote:
Originally posted by TazDevil
since i didnt have any code i couldnt steal it, i reverse engineered it.

That's exactly the same as 'stealing' (or maybe slithly worse as a compiled program is obviously made because the author doesn't want to share the source)
RE: Reloader Source ? by ipab on 09-27-2005 at 08:06 AM

um, TB does it all the time, wtbw did it (if i recall correctly he taught TB to do it) (im refering to reverse-engineering), therefore it should be fair game for TazDevil.


RE: Reloader Source ? by RaceProUK on 09-27-2005 at 09:10 AM

Reverse engineering - isn't that common practice? wtbw reverse-engineered the MSN hashing algorithm, which I'm sure several developers use. I do. And, to an extent, Patchou and many plugin developers have reverse engineered Messenger so they can get under the hood and tinker.

It's just that people don't usually admit to reverse engineering, because it can be frowned upon. If I want to know how someone did something, I'll usually start by asking for pointers in the right direction. I don't necessarily want full code (doesn't help people to have full code), but snippets are helpful.

TB, I do agree with you in principle. That's why I have put in the readme for Phoenix 2 that people are able to look at the resources in it, but not change them. Then again, all the resources are strings, piccies and dialogs.


RE: Reloader Source ? by TheBlasphemer on 09-27-2005 at 01:22 PM

Ah yes, let's totally disregard with what the developer says, and then let's all be suprised when he gets pissed off...
What a wonderful world we live in indeed...
</sarcasm>


RE: Reloader Source ? by CookieRevised on 09-27-2005 at 02:47 PM

@ipab, raceprouk

There is still a (social) difference between reverse engineering MSN Messenger to make addons, plugins and what not, and reverse engeneer a plugin made by your fellow programmers to rip it off...

Yes, technically it is the same, but there is still something like not touching code from your friends and respect their whishes.



quote:
Originally posted by raceprouk
It's just that people don't usually admit to reverse engineering, because it can be frowned upon. If I want to know how someone did something, I'll usually start by asking for pointers in the right direction. I don't necessarily want full code (doesn't help people to have full code), but snippets are helpful.
I agree on that, and in that way reverse engeneering can help. But this was not the impression I get when I read:
quote:
since i didnt have any code i couldnt steal it, i reverse engineered it.

RE: Reloader Source ? by (CyBeRDuDe) on 09-27-2005 at 02:55 PM

ARGH!!!!!!
Couldn't hold this post back... :(
TB! Stop that baby shit!
You are really acting like a #¤W%#¤% kid on 5 years.. You are really being to ridiculous... Sorry people, but you gotta admit he is.. Again.. As he has done before in the past... All you sarcasm and "oh no" BS...
Why wouldn't you want to help TazDevil?... Is it beacuse he wants to develope an improved version of one your plugins????... Is it beacuse you feel it would be competition?... No.. I see... You did spend much time on getting the Reloader to work as it does.. Then why didn't you spend 5 more minutes to do the improvement as TazDevil wants to do?... Or if you didn't think about it then, then do it now?... It would help the other developers a hell of lot.. It is nice to have a reloader, but it's really a pain in the ass to have to have an open conversation to reload plugins and to type in a command to reload.. this means I will have to be online on the account I uses.. But what if I want to stay offline.. If I test something, and don't want to be online.. What then?? Use my secondary account.. Yes, but then I wouldn't be able to still watch my standard account contacts, e.g. if my "under development plugin" doesn't support polygamy or craches....
The greatest would be a Reloader plugin in which you can define 2 hotkeys, one to unload plugins, and then it will keep unloaded until you press hotkey 2... Or something similar... You could have done this ages ago... And now someone wants to do it for you.. Of course giving you credits for it... But all you can say is "No"... You could have giving a better answer.. A answer he could relate to... Maybe you could have giving him a hint on what to do/where to look... Something!!! Anything but a "No" answer!!!!.. We are a god damn community, people are supposed to stick together and help eachother... We are trying to create great plugins, not #¤%#% competion... If you don't want to help and be part of the community.. Why are you here then????... We have to help eachother...
It's ok if you don't want to give out the entire source, but you could at least have spent 1 minute on giving him some hints as to what to do, of if you didn't want to do that, then you could be willing to create this reloader yourself... You might do that, I don't know.. But then you at least could have stated in your post that you would do that, so he shouldn't worry...
I know it's wrong to reverse engineere other peoples plugins... But what would you expect with an answer like that????....
You think you own the reloader plugin part because you made this smart feature to hold it until a button was clicked... NO!!!! Nobody owns any thing!!!!.... There is no competition, no nothing!!!! Just plain and simple programming.. Community.. Sharing... Making the best out of messenger.. That is what this is about... But why don't you want to help us the other developers to make greater and greater plugins?....

TazDevil:
Hope you get this running.. :)... Or at least that TB will get himself together and do this thing instead, if he won't let you do it...
This will be a big help for me... :)... It will at least making the plugin programming, testing and reloading a litle easier.. :)...


RE: Reloader Source ? by TheBlasphemer on 09-27-2005 at 03:05 PM

Ah yes, Me having spent hours on getting this to work really doesn't mean a lot to you, doesn't it?
If you're going to use my work, then why don't you pay for it?
I decided to distribute this for free, but this doesn't mean I give permission to every half-arsed developer to rip out the main code and use it in his plugin.
I'm not stopping taz from making his own reloader plugin, I don't care about that. My reloader isn't making me any money at all, and to be honest I'd already forgotten about it.
But if he wants to do his own, he should do his own research, just like I did. I am in no way obligated to share my knowledge with anyone, and if I ever do share information like this, I will do so out of my free damn will.

The main problem with your 25-lines of bullshit is that you've forgotten one major thing: It's freeware, I decided to share it with the world myself, and this does not in any way force me to make it just the way you'd want it. It was provided as-is, and if you're not satisfied make your own. And by "Your own" I mean by doing your own testing, investigating, retrying, and so on.

EDIT:

quote:
Originally posted by (CyBeRDuDe)
ARGH!!!!!!
Couldn't hold this post back... :(
TB! Stop that baby shit!
You are really acting like a #¤W%#¤% kid on 5 years.. You are really being to ridiculous... Sorry people, but you gotta admit he is.. Again.. As he has done before in the past... All you sarcasm and "oh no" BS...
Ah yes, as soon as I don't just plainly accept anything thrown at me, or decide to not help out like I usually do, people always bring that up... but tell me, what's your fucking point there? It makes no bloody sense!
quote:
Why wouldn't you want to help TazDevil?... Is it beacuse he wants to develope an improved version of one your plugins????... Is it beacuse you feel it would be competition?... No.. I see... You did spend much time on getting the Reloader to work as it does.. Then why didn't you spend 5 more minutes to do the improvement as TazDevil wants to do?... Or if you didn't think about it then, then do it now?... It would help the other developers a hell of lot.. It is nice to have a reloader, but it's really a pain in the ass to have to have an open conversation to reload plugins and to type in a command to reload.. this means I will have to be online on the account I uses.. But what if I want to stay offline.. If I test something, and don't want to be online.. What then?? Use my secondary account.. Yes, but then I wouldn't be able to still watch my standard account contacts, e.g. if my "under development plugin" doesn't support polygamy or craches....
The greatest would be a Reloader plugin in which you can define 2 hotkeys, one to unload plugins, and then it will keep unloaded until you press hotkey 2... Or something similar... You could have done this ages ago... And now someone wants to do it for you.. Of course giving you credits for it... But all you can say is "No"...
The plugin was provided as is, I couldn't care less what you want, I was merely sharing something I created for myself. And the reason I said just "No" was that at the time I was really hung-over, couldn't be bothered to type more. And thinking back, I don't think I had to type more, I am still the developer of the plugin, and I am not obliged in any way to explain why I refuse to cooperate with something.
quote:
You could have giving a better answer.. A answer he could relate to... Maybe you could have giving him a hint on what to do/where to look... Something!!! Anything but a "No" answer!!!!.. We are a god damn community, people are supposed to stick together and help eachother... We are trying to create great plugins, not #¤%#% competion... If you don't want to help and be part of the community.. Why are you here then????... We have to help eachother...
You really don't get it, do you? Normally I help out, a lot more than I should be at times, and this time when I refuse, I get crap like this thrown at me? would you call that community behaviour?!
quote:
It's ok if you don't want to give out the entire source, but you could at least have spent 1 minute on giving him some hints as to what to do, of if you didn't want to do that, then you could be willing to create this reloader yourself... You might do that, I don't know.. But then you at least could have stated in your post that you would do that, so he shouldn't worry...
I know it's wrong to reverse engineere other peoples plugins... But what would you expect with an answer like that????....
I'd expect people to just accept my answer. is that too much to ask?
You ask me something, I refuse, and you keep on whining? that's five-year-old behaviour...
quote:
You think you own the reloader plugin part because you made this smart feature to hold it until a button was clicked... NO!!!! Nobody owns any thing!!!!.... There is no competition, no nothing!!!! Just plain and simple programming.. Community.. Sharing... Making the best out of messenger.. That is what this is about... But why don't you want to help us the other developers to make greater and greater plugins?....

I own the code I write. And if you disagree, then don't touch it.
RE: Reloader Source ? by ipab on 09-27-2005 at 04:10 PM

well TB your reason for saying NO makes total sense now, everyone has a right to say no.

the one word answer seemed a little rude thats all and I apologise if I insulted you, I was just sticking up for Taz.

no one is saying that you are unwilling to help or anything like that since we have seen firsthand how much  you have improved over time in giving people assistance. I agree that you used to be a bit rude, but you have become a really nice and generous person, helping many people who inturn give you great respect and credit for your help. It's a give and take thing (although you give a LOT more). People get desperate when they have been doing something for a long time and getting nowhere, I think that this was the case with Taz.

Anyway i think that this post has gone on long enough, so as a final note, I apologie on behalf of cyberdude and Taz and lets stop this flame thread and move on.

Peace,
ipab.

p.s. you blocked me :(, it truly saddens me.

p.p.s

quote:
Originally posted by kangie

Gotta agree with TB tbh... You say it was fine for MSN messenger to be reverse engineered, but not for TB's plugin to be.

I don't get it.

on a side note, just because people at microsoft get paid for their work doesn't give people more justification to decompile it as opposed to another freeware program or plugin.
RE: Reloader Source ? by hmaster on 09-27-2005 at 04:18 PM

Taz i think it would be better if you tried to make your own from scratch :undecided:


RE: Reloader Source ? by ShawnZ on 09-27-2005 at 04:33 PM

quote:
Originally posted by ipab
on a side note, just because people at microsoft get paid for their work doesn't give people more justification to decompile it as opposed to another freeware program or plugin.


thats not the only thing she said, read the whole thing and don't skip to conclusions

she said that because microsoft has a VERY LARGE TEAM of PROFESSIONALS that are also getting PAID, it's easier for them to code a little reloader plugin then one guy thats doing it by just reading through documentations.
RE: Reloader Source ? by emit on 09-27-2005 at 04:40 PM

"A thousand monkeys, typing on a thousand typewriters will eventually type the entire works of William Shakespeare."

Does that make the entire works of William Shakespeare the property of the monkeys too since they created it on their own?

Code is just characters typed out in a certain order so it hardly matters if you reverse engineer MSN or TB's plugins because a thousand monkeys with a thousand typewriters would eventually have written the same code anyway so claiming ownership of such things is rather pointless.

Good luck to TazDevil in enhancing the plugin I say.


RE: Reloader Source ? by CookieRevised on 09-27-2005 at 05:09 PM

quote:
Originally posted by Time
Code is just characters typed out in a certain order so it hardly matters if you reverse engineer MSN or TB's plugins because a thousand monkeys with a thousand typewriters would eventually have written the same code anyway so claiming ownership of such things is rather pointless.
yeah right... until I see those thousand monkeys handing over their works to the Globe Theater on the six 'o clock news, this old saying is just something used to justify stealing...

In the real world there is still something like having intellectual copyright of code. If this wasn't so, then everything, and I mean everything, would have been totally open source and nobody would care if one copy-pasted some code and claimed its own...

-------------------

On the subject of the plugin: I perfectly understand the point of TB. Though I also understand Taz' point. But if you want something to be improved you first contact the author (like you did) and explain in great detail what you want or what you want to do (and not after you say: "I cant steal it so I reverse engeneer it"). If the author doesn't agree with it, you're on your own and this does not mean stealing code, but means finding out yourself. Even how inconvenient it might be. Of course it would be good if the author gives hints or pointers to know where to start (re)searching, but he doesn't have to if he doesn't feel like it...

About helping others in the community: That's all good and well, but I also have seen at first hand that if you help somebody by even trying to teach them how to do something, they often end up simply copy/pasting the code you gave them as an example instead of investigating and learning how something is done and figgering out why that example isn't good as 'final' code.

((one for Time:P) "give a man a fish and he can eat for one day, teach him how to fish and he can eat his whole life". Unfortunatly many men still prefer to be handed fish each day and don't wanna learn how to fish...)

I'm not saying Taz is somebody like that, but it happens all too often. And IMHO it is that what TB also knows and doesn't want to happen and because of that reacted like he did (although giving some hints/pointers wouldn't have hurt and he apparently had a hang-over, also not a good state to give proper replies in) ...
RE: RE: Reloader Source ? by (CyBeRDuDe) on 09-27-2005 at 07:16 PM

Okay.. First off... I'd like to make a small apology to you TB...
But not fully...

quote:
Originally posted by TheBlasphemer
Ah yes, Me having spent hours on getting this to work really doesn't mean a lot to you, doesn't it?

I didn't say anything like that.. I appricate your Plugin Reloader... I use it frequently when I experiment, and build plugins... But to be honest, I didn't think it had taken you so much time to get this working.. Therefor I didn't see this as a big deal... Sorry for that one...
quote:
Originally posted by TheBlasphemer
If you're going to use my work, then why don't you pay for it?
I decided to distribute this for free, but this doesn't mean I give permission to every half-arsed developer to rip out the main code and use it in his plugin.

That is exactly why I joined this community, and why I myself is doing this shit, it's because we give it for free to the people... I don't want to pay for a bloddy plugin, and neither do I want to take for money for a plugin...
No it doesn't mean you give permission to everyone to steal your code... But see, my general problem with this thread all started with your "No" answer... This gave me the feeling that you were not at all interested in TazDevil making this improved Plugin Reloader... Rather it seemed you were somehow mad about it... And that ticked me off... I got the feeling that you were scared someone would use his version more than yours... Or something similar.. I don't say that was what you were thinking, but that was the feeling I got from your answer... Then afterwards you write "If you want to do it that way, go along, just don't expect me to do anything for you ever again in the future. "... This just sounded so stupid.. Sounded like something taking from a kids-series or something.. It was like saying, this means war... Yes, he did reverse engineere your stuff, and that's bad.. But hell with it.. Relax, it's a god danm plugin reloader..

quote:
Originally posted by TheBlasphemer
I'm not stopping taz from making his own reloader plugin, I don't care about that. My reloader isn't making me any money at all, and to be honest I'd already forgotten about it.

See.. Relax.. You had even forgot about it.. Then why make such an outcry out of it?... You plugin reloader is probably one of the earliest plugins for Messenger Plus!... Does it date 2 years back?...

quote:
Originally posted by TheBlasphemer
But if he wants to do his own, he should do his own research, just like I did. I am in no way obligated to share my knowledge with anyone, and if I ever do share information like this, I will do so out of my free damn will.

That is true... No you are not obligated to share information.. But I kinda think this lies in the "To be part of the community"... As I said you wouldn't need to share source.. Just a litle hint.. Anything but a simle "No"..
quote:
Originally posted by TheBlasphemer

The main problem with your 25-lines of bullshit is that you've forgotten one major thing: It's freeware, I decided to share it with the world myself, and this does not in any way force me to make it just the way you'd want it. It was provided as-is, and if you're not satisfied make your own. And by "Your own" I mean by doing your own testing, investigating, retrying, and so on.

Also true.. But see, this is what I don't get.. Why hadn't you made a new advanced version of it, sometime ago?... I just think it would be plain and simple "Developer Strategy" to make something that "small" would make things so much simpler for a lot of people.. Yes, your own testing, investigating, retrying... But see, my thought was that in general this was something easy to do, it was just to get it right, just that tiny litle bit... But why spend valuable programming time on people doing the same research over and over again when 1 man could help them all in 1 single line of text(without even giving source code, and maybe a litle more than 1 sentence..)... When we instead could concentrate about throwing out some good and useable plugins... I'm sorry if I have misunderstood something in the terms of community, but I was just thinking that our objective was to create and give out some nice plugins and help eachother and be together as a team/community and not like competitors competing each other..

quote:
Originally posted by TheBlasphemer
Ah yes, as soon as I don't just plainly accept anything thrown at me, or decide to not help out like I usually do, people always bring that up... but tell me, what's your fucking point there? It makes no bloody sense!

Well, I haven't been much active on these boards the past 3 months.. So I don't know how much you have been around here during that period.. But before that, yes you were a great person.. you were on the board, but I don't think you were much on the Plugins part of the board, giving much help.. I don't say you should, nor do I say that you had time for it, you have and had a lot of other things to look after, and you have also seemed to help people... But I know for a fact that you being a (sorry to say it) dickhead, and you were... You can't deny that.. You have changed to a much better person on this area, but this kinda looked like a step back for you..
quote:
The plugin was provided as is, I couldn't care less what you want, I was merely sharing something I created for myself. And the reason I said just "No" was that at the time I was really hung-over, couldn't be bothered to type more. And thinking back, I don't think I had to type more, I am still the developer of the plugin, and I am not obliged in any way to explain why I refuse to cooperate with something.

No, you couldn't care less what we want.. See that's a problem.. We are a community!..
Ok, see you did have a hung-over.. Then that gives a reason for why you didn't want to post something "big"... But you could at least have written something like "No, not really, spent much time on getting it working, there are much research behind it, but go take a look at XXXXXXX" or something similar... Just a tiny litle bit hint.. A answer for why you didn't want to give it away.. Anything!!!!!... Just not a simple "No".. Okay, you had a hang-over, fair enough, but a few more letters could have made a big difference...
quote:
You really don't get it, do you? Normally I help out, a lot more than I should be at times, and this time when I refuse, I get crap like this thrown at me? would you call that community behaviour?!

Sorry about that one.. I don't know if i've been the wrong places, and I don't know if you help out alot other places(Which you probably do), and yes you have been to more help than you needed... But still, the short "No" was just not a answer someone could relate to..
quote:
I'd expect people to just accept my answer. is that too much to ask?
You ask me something, I refuse, and you keep on whining? that's five-year-old behaviour...

Yes, people should accept your answer.. But then give a answer we can use for something.. Like "No, I've spent much time on it, do your own research." if that is what you wanted to say...
quote:
I own the code I write. And if you disagree, then don't touch it.

Yes you own the code you write... But I was talking about the general part of having a pause between the unloading/loading of the plugins.. You made it sound like you had copyright on that part or something...

Sorry for this discussion/conversation... Hope this finds it ways out peacefully...
RE: Reloader Source ? by TheBlasphemer on 09-28-2005 at 08:42 AM

Alright, Time gets the treatment first. Yes, ofcourse monkeys *could* write the works of Shakespeare. But the chances of them doing that in the average lifespan of a monkey is very close to 0.000000% percent.
There are a thousand different lovestories out there similar to Romeo and Juliet, and I that's what is meant by the saying you quoted. It happens all the time people get similar ideas.
However, This would not justify just adding one or two extra scenes to Romeo and Juliet, and then distributing it as your own...
I have no problem at all with Taz making another Reloader plugin, it'd be a great learning opportunity for him, as it has been for me. What I will not accept is him just plainly stealing my code from the resources and building something else around that. Someone who would do that is not worthy to be called a developer... That's what the terms "Asshole", "Scriptkiddie" and "N00b" are meant for.

Right, (Cyberdude), quit the crap. Stop repeating yourself to make your post look big. It'll only have people read it halfway before deciding it's just bullshit and repetition of what you already said.
I might've been a "dickhead" in the past, but this was in no way related to things like this. It was a fight between KoalaBlue and me that turned out pretty bad. It had nothing to do with sharing things with the community as I've even shared a lot of code and plugins before that.
Let me just repeat this one more time, hoping it will finally reach your thick brain. I am in no way obliged to share my code, my plugins, or my knowledge. The plugin was written for my own testing, and I decided to share it with others. I did and do not care about what you want, because I am not your personal fucking little coding slave. If you don't like what I offer, then do not take it. I will add new features when I feel like it, not on demand. I do all of this in my own spare time, and if you want me to do something specific, I suggest you contact me about the pricing.
Even if this is a community, it does not mean I am forced to give other people hints. Hell, I did it without hints too, didn't I?

Now seriously, if you decide to just steal, rip, and fuck with things that people shared,
How can you expect people to continue sharing?


RE: Reloader Source ? by lordy on 09-28-2005 at 08:53 AM

ok at first i though TB was being a bit mean, because Taz did ask quite nicely. but now that TB has explained his side i can definately see his point. TB learnt how to code that plugin, did all the research etc. BY HIMSELF which means that someone else can do the same thing as well. the info is obviously available out there somewhere!


RE: Reloader Source ? by emit on 09-28-2005 at 10:11 AM

Cookie: I agree in theory but there is a glaring omission everyone standing up for TB's code is making - the fact that he has reverse engineered MSN. Did he ask MSN's coders for tips first? You can say "oh, but MSN is a team of coders with corporate money blah blah" but each individual coder is not an arsehole or so; they're just doing their jobs! Plus, MSN is free. It's not like they're charging for it. So, you know, MSN is distributed AS IS - don't like that then go code your whole own IM client and network. The sword cuts both ways, eh. I imagine that if this thread had been about TazDevil needing tips reverse engineering MSN then half a dozen developers would've jumped at helping him instead of TB's rather rude, flat-out "No."

"Now seriously, if you decide to just steal, rip, and fuck with things that people shared,
How can you expect people to continue sharing?"

Because TazDevil might have some serious enhancements to make? Because open source software is the future of developing? How many open source apps do you use TB? How many apps have you reverse engineered to get their code and stolen it? Yeah, you're hardly a moral angel AND TazDevil did ask nicely in the first place. I am sure that TazDevil woud have given full due to TB in his improved plugin, so he's hardly stealing it and claiming it as his own. Even with a hangover TB should've put a reason rather than just a one word epithet. Fuck that, arrogance of that level is just so unjustified.
By being given a fish a day people will themselves observe and learn to be sustainable in time.

TB: I don't need a lesson on history and etymology from you thanks, I know full well the intended meaning of the phrase; but as a hypothetical it is a fitting analogy.


RE: Reloader Source ? by TheBlasphemer on 09-28-2005 at 10:17 AM

quote:
Because TazDevil might have some serious enhancements to make? Because open source software is the future of developing? How many open source apps do you use TB? How many apps have you reverse engineered to get their code and stolen it? Yeah, you're hardly a moral angel AND TazDevil did ask nicely in the first place. I am sure that TazDevil woud have given full due to TB in his improved plugin, so he's hardly stealing it and claiming it as his own. Even with a hangover TB should've put a reason rather than just a one word epithet. Fuck that, arrogance of that level is just so unjustified.
I didn't ask about TazDevils reasons to share, It's more about if you just plainly rip my code, how can you expect me to share anything else in the future?
furthermore, Why should I have puut a reason? He asked a question, I answered, There are no unwritten laws that force me to explain every answer I give.
Just a sidenote, I've always considered people calling you a "wanker" or "tosser" or any other insult to have misunderstood you or something, but this really made me change my mind about this. I can no longer say I disagree with them...
RE: Reloader Source ? by lordy on 09-28-2005 at 10:27 AM

ok, honestly guys this is becoming very childish. i think we should just drop this completely. it's just becoming a name -calling excercise and people are repeating themselves.

TB has given his answer and he's as stubborn as they come as i'm sure you've noticed from this thread so i highly doubt he's going to change his mind!!

drop it


RE: RE: Reloader Source ? by TheBlasphemer on 09-28-2005 at 10:34 AM

quote:
Originally posted by lordy16
... it's just becoming a name -calling excercise ...

... he's as stubborn as they come ...

Let's play spot the contradiction...
RE: Reloader Source ? by lordy on 09-28-2005 at 10:36 AM

quote:
Originally posted by TheBlasphemer
Let's play spot the contradiction...

from this thread it's plain as day TB, and many people have told me the exact same thing about you before

i dont think calling someone stubborn is calling them a 'name' such as 'wanker' or whatever, which is what you basically said to Time. being stubborn is a peronality trait
RE: Reloader Source ? by TheBlasphemer on 09-28-2005 at 10:48 AM

Alright, I don't care what the hell you think.
I wouldn't mind at all if some of you dropped from a fairly high building, but let's put it like this way:
I will not tolerate this kind of behaviour, simply stealing my code, nor will I tolerate people asking me something and then totally disregarding my answer.
I've totally had it. You should expect no more help, guiding, hints, sources, or freeware plugins from me.


RE: Reloader Source ? by linx05 on 09-28-2005 at 10:52 AM

Well you've done it now guys...

EDIT: May I ask what if someone came in and ask for the source code of Messenger Plus! ? Everyone would say no of course, it just wouldn't happen. Then what would you say if that same guy said he would reverse-engineer it and make his own Messenger Addon from the code of Plus!. What would you do then?

Just because it's a small plugin doesn't mean it deserves the respect of all the hours, research and hard work the author has put into it.

You've pushed him so far now that he won't help you. Are you happy?

Some people have bad days. And you've got to respect that especially over the internet.


RE: Reloader Source ? by L. Coyote on 09-28-2005 at 10:53 AM

To be honest, ripping code from another programmer is lame. And it's even worse when they said no.

There is no obligation from any of the developers to share their code or help others out. But if people abuse this, then don't come crying that someone gets mad...


RE: Reloader Source ? by Chestah on 09-28-2005 at 11:51 AM

Ok, i really think this thread should be closed =/ .

The concluding facts are that reverse engineering or stealing code from a developer/programmer is immoral and illegal. If you want to use another developer's code you should ask them explaining what you want to do with it (as Cookie said previously). If the programmer says "No" then simply thats it - its their choice, they put in all the effort to make it. It is their interlectual property covered by copyright laws.

Heard of the saying "Don't judge a book by its cover"? - TB was hung-over at the time, he has explained now that is the case and in a sense has apologised for his original answer. I'm sure somedays i act very strange, but that doesn't mean i'm a bad person or anyone else that goes through these different moods.

Now, to be honest TazDevil hasn't even really replied after the point TB made it clear that he would not share his code (which is fair enough). TazDevil did not "heat" up the argument or anything like this so lets please not vent this anger towards him.

Theres obviously a difference of opinon here and i'm trying to stay as neutral as i can. I'm sure everyone knows about all that crap if "if everyone was the same..." etc. The point is everyone is going to have different opinons on this matter.


RE: Reloader Source ? by emit on 09-28-2005 at 12:34 PM

quote:
Originally posted by TheBlasphemer
I didn't ask about TazDevils reasons to share, It's more about if you just plainly rip my code, how can you expect me to share anything else in the future?
furthermore, Why should I have puut a reason? He asked a question, I answered, There are no unwritten laws that force me to explain every answer I give.
Just a sidenote, I've always considered people calling you a "wanker" or "tosser" or any other insult to have misunderstood you or something, but this really made me change my mind about this. I can no longer say I disagree with them...

Alright, I don't care what the hell you think.
I wouldn't mind at all if some of you dropped from a fairly high building, but let's put it like this way:
I will not tolerate this kind of behaviour, simply stealing my code, nor will I tolerate people asking me something and then totally disregarding my answer.
I've totally had it. You should expect no more help, guiding, hints, sources, or freeware plugins from me.


When you rip other peoples' code do you expect them to make their software in the future? Oh man you're just FULL of double standards TB, please get some morals and principles before you try and impose your own bullshit "principles" on others. Why should you put a reason? It's common courtesy; he had the courtesy to ask you you should have the courtesy to give a decent justification. Hey, you know what, some of us wouldn't mind if YOU dropped from a fairly high building. You may be an above average coder but by God you're an inane, arrogant, immoral young man. No more plugins - great, they never worked properly anyway. How about all the other stupid things you've done? A site with Rolando to steal MSN passwords for example. They just inspire respect! Yeah, I'm bored of typing sarcasm to a child. Go and wallow in your pathos elsewhere.

* emit sighs