MSN Messenger 7.5.0311 Poly?? NE1? - Printable Version
-Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net)
+-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58)
+--- Forum: Skype & Technology (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Skype & Live Messenger (/forumdisplay.php?fid=10)
+----- Thread: MSN Messenger 7.5.0311 Poly?? NE1? (/showthread.php?tid=53130)
MSN Messenger 7.5.0311 Poly?? NE1? by Soul_Reaver on 11-20-2005 at 04:05 PM
Has anyone found a polygammy patch for MSN Messenger 7.5.0311 yet? I've always liked MSN Ghost by Volv, but they haven't released one yet. Everyone seems to be dragging their feet.
???
RE: MSN Messenger 7.5.0311 Poly?? NE1? by Max on 11-20-2005 at 04:09 PM
Download Mess Patch from Mess.be or A-Patch from A-Patch, or to make it legal - StuffPlug - NG but StuffPlug requires Messenger Plus!
RE: MSN Messenger 7.5.0311 Poly?? NE1? by Zahid™ on 11-20-2005 at 05:29 PM
[Mess Patch] [A-Patch]
RE: MSN Messenger 7.5.0311 Poly?? NE1? by absorbation on 11-20-2005 at 06:09 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Patches
or to make it legal
1.) it's against terms of use
2.) stuffplug is not totally legal infact as cookie said "patchs would be black and programs would be grey"
There are many things that enable polygramy if you want something just for polygramy then i suggest multi msn by the boss:
http://www.msgshit.com/downloads/521
RE: MSN Messenger 7.5.0311 Poly?? NE1? by Max on 11-20-2005 at 07:24 PM
I thought StuffPlug uses alot of advanced coding, instead of patching?
RE: MSN Messenger 7.5.0311 Poly?? NE1? by ShawnZ on 11-20-2005 at 08:19 PM
quote:stuffplug is totally legal...
Originally posted by Absorbation
2.) stuffplug is not totally legal infact as
cookiesaid "patchs would be black and programs would be
grey"
RE: MSN Messenger 7.5.0311 Poly?? NE1? by Soul_Reaver on 11-20-2005 at 11:34 PM
Thanks Patches... I checked the one on Mess.be, but it didn't say it would work for this build... but the one from Apatch did!
RE: RE: MSN Messenger 7.5.0311 Poly?? NE1? by CookieRevised on 11-21-2005 at 01:07 AM
[OFF TOPIC]
quote:Errrmmm... hehehe... almost
Originally posted by Absorbation
2.) stuffplug is not totally legal infact as cookie said "patchs would be black and programs would be grey"
"If a normal legal program is white and hard patches (illegal) are black, than soft patching (patching in memory) is grey..."
quote:both... It also 'simply' patches a lot of stuff. In fact many things of what people call "advanced coding" is nothing more than soft patching.
Originally posted by Patches
I thought StuffPlug uses alot of advanced coding, instead of patching?
-and with that I don't mean that stuffplug is nothing advanced at all
-also the trick is to know what and how to patch of course
quote:Some stuff of what StuffPlug does involves patching the program file in memory (as apposed to patching the program file itself on disc)
Originally posted by .Fusion
AFAIK, it patches in the virtual memory or something...?
Please correct me if im wrong, im not a programmer but i swear i heard that somewhere....
quote:No it is not!!! Patching in ANY way is still technically as illegal as robbing a bank. Patching in memory is only "a bit less illegal" than patching a program file on disc. StuffPlug is certainly not "totally legal".
Originally posted by ShawnZ
stuffplug is totally legal...
[/OFF TOPIC]
RE: MSN Messenger 7.5.0311 Poly?? NE1? by GiantSpider on 11-28-2005 at 10:42 PM
I thought it was loaders that were "grey" & that "soft" patching & "hard" patching were each as bad as each other.
RE: MSN Messenger 7.5.0311 Poly?? NE1? by CookieRevised on 11-29-2005 at 12:09 AM
hmm, true... the comparisson with robbing a bank was exaggerated (and technically -in context of law- not correct). But I needed something strong to get the point across
When most people speak in these contexts of altering MSN Messenger (in any way) and the word "illegal" is used, I almost am certain they all mean 'illegal' as in breaking the contract which you accepted when you use the program.
In terms of law and all, this word "illegal" is indeed not the same and it is debatable in court, as "illegal" is a word used in reference to law, and it is not a law you're braking but a contract between you and the program maker.
But this said (and thus, I fully agree with you on this matter), I bet that now people are going to say and understand all this as patching is very legal to do (people simply think that way and/or take it that way), ... hence my use of a strong comparisson and not so technically correct (in every detail) description. (the end/result justifies the means).
------
quote:
A loader almost always loads a program and then patches some stuff in memory (so the program runs, so the game score is froozen, so you can cheat, etc... ) aka the exact definition of a "soft" patch.
Originally posted by tehGspider
I thought it was loaders that were "grey" & that "soft" patching & "hard" patching were each as bad as each other.