anyone know how i can remove the dot off the <li> tag, i need to remove it for a website nav bar::

http://methos2.skarz.co.uk/JCC2

thanks!

I don't know if this will work, but it might:

code:

---

li{
visibility: hidden;
}

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by traxor
li{
visibility: hidden;
}

---

code:

---

list-style-type: none;

---

thanks mate! works a treat!

notice : the site looks dodgy on opera, the hover effects on the menu get displaced ..

Screenshot :

hmm.... thanks, didnt notice that, i dont have opera, thanks for the tip

quote:

---

Originally posted by Madman

code:

---

list-style-type: none;

---

apply that to the ul element that contains the li's

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by CookieRevised
All this can be done with normal basic HTML, no stylesheet manipulation is needed...

The proper syntax is:
<ul>
    <il>
    <il>
    <il>
</ul>

or instead of <ul> (unordered list) use <ol> (ordered list). Those lists always have idents in the form of bullets, numbers, etc...

To have the same effect but without the bullets, numbers, etc, you need to create a definition list instead of a normal list:

<dl>
    <dt>
    <dd>
</dl>

Where <dt> is the term being used in the definition and <dd> the definiation itself. They have the same ident as in a normal list.

---

[OFF TOPIC]
There are also other list forms, eg:

<menu>
  <li>
  <li>
  <li>
</menu>

or

<dir>
  <li>
  <li>
  <li>
</dir>



PS: Oh, and the site menu works nicely in Netscape btw, no errors (except for the broken links of course).

[/OFF TOPIC]

The menu and dir elements are now deprecated, in favour of ul.

Also, the method that Madman posted is entirely correct, end does not need a stylesheet, it can be applied directly to the element, although if you already have a stylesheet, it will most likely be easier to add it to the stylesheet.

Further, the unstyled rendering of dl varies more across browsers than does that of ul and ol.

PS CookieRevised, you've posted il instead of li in your first example.

quote:

---

Originally posted by rav0
Also, the method that Madman posted is entirely correct

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by rav0
and does not need a stylesheet, it can be applied directly to the element, although if you already have a stylesheet, it will most likely be easier to add it to the stylesheet.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by rav0
PS CookieRevised, you've posted il instead of li in your first example.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by The Website

excess of 240km/h (50mph)

---

lol, probably, but its not me that has wrote the content, im only the desinger

is it just me or does the drop down menu not work in IE?!?! why is this so? is the JS not compatible or something?

quote:

---

Originally posted by CookieRevised
only since HTML version whatever. In other words, not all browsers might support it.

Note: you don't need to create a stylesheet only for that. the type= is a supported element of the <ul> or <ol> tags. For <ul> it can be "disc", "circle", "square" (these are the only totally all-round supported values. any other value requires a higher version of HTML or whatever). For <ol>, the value of type= can be "A", "a", "I", "i", or "1" (again, these are the only basic totally all-round supported values, unless your page is in HTML version whatever)

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by CookieRevised

To have the same effect but without the bullets, numbers, etc, you need to create a definition list instead of a normal list:

<dl>
    <dt>
    <dd>
</dl>

Where <dt> is the term being used in the definition and <dd> the definition itself. They have the same ident as in a normal list.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by CookieRevised
[OFF TOPIC]
There are also other list forms, eg:

<menu>
  <li>
  <li>
  <li>
</menu>

or

<dir>
  <li>
  <li>
  <li>
</dir>

---

can anyone see why the drop down menu doesnt work within IE??

quote:

---

Originally posted by Methos2
can anyone see why the drop down menu doesnt work within IE??

---

but this  works in IE.... why not mine?

quote:

---

Originally posted by Methos2
but this  works in IE.... why not mine?

---

no wonder... lol.... ill look into it, thanks!