What is faster and better? - Printable Version
-Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net)
+-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58)
+--- Forum: Skype & Technology (/forumdisplay.php?fid=9)
+---- Forum: Tech Talk (/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+----- Thread: What is faster and better? (/showthread.php?tid=57166)
What is faster and better? by YourNeibour on 03-19-2006 at 03:04 AM
I want to backup some of my DVD's is it faster just to use DVD Shrink to copy from DVD to DVD or use dycryptor then dvd shrink?
RE: What is faster and better? by Voldemort on 03-19-2006 at 03:13 AM
DVD to DVD....
if not, its decripted, then encripted and burned... which is just a waste of time...
RE: What is faster and better? by linx05 on 03-19-2006 at 03:14 AM
Some DVDs might have a copy protection which DVD Shrink cannot handle. In that case, use DVD Decrypter than Shrink.
If Shrink can handle the DVD, use it.
I would always use DVD Decrypter first. But that is just me.
RE: What is faster and better? by YourNeibour on 03-19-2006 at 03:18 AM
Doesn't it also depend on the DVD size if it's 4 gig or 8gig?
RE: What is faster and better? by lizard.boy on 03-20-2006 at 01:14 AM
The lazy (but more expensive way) to do dvds is a combination of Anydvd and Clonedvd2 from slysoft.
RE: What is faster and better? by Ezra on 03-20-2006 at 01:21 AM
Why not just use DVD Shrink and for the encryption methods it can't handle (never had that), use Dvd Decrypter first.
Naturally only using one program is faster.