Off the road http://www.cypherpunks.ca/otr/ encryption for messenger that supports various other messengers like Pidgin Miranda and some other one...

It would be great since Microsoft obviously will never implement it and unfortunatly the other messengers dont support Video Chat.

Plenty of people out there use OTR and it works with messenger protocol just cant install it directly into messenger it has to be installed into pidgin yet another half a dozen messenger for one single job...

Alternatives are already made into scripts

http://www.msgpluslive.net/scripts/search/?q=encryption

SHA1, MD4, MD5, Base64, Hex, Binary and URL-encoding.

One of the 2 scripts will likely fit your case (crYpt)

Also, the free Simp Lite or the paid for version (if you require its features) work very well with all versions of Messenger, with or without Plus!. 

Some might consider it less trustworthy than OTR because it is not open source, however.

yea well there is a reason why I asked for OTR specifically all those scrtipts are not compatible with OTR and Every one I chat with uses OTR not these other ones in fact no one else really uses msn.

Besides to the fact I cant think of a better one to support, its a shame its not even considered.

I use Msn cause I can Video chat but theres so many people out there with so many clients its hard to keep up, Pidgin is a great multi protocol messenger that supports plugings and OTR but no web cam, so round and round we go dozens of of messengers and all half baked none really complete and then theres guys like you that offer a great potential and astounding extras  but still its only a single protocol and the world has outgrown one thing.

So realistically its two or 3 messengers installed instead of one plus all the addons like yours and every thing else...

Is it just me thinking this is ridiculous?

Actually that way of thinking is pretty similar to Microsoft well we already do this why do that?

I thought Messenger Plus Live was about showing MS adn giving the WLM users the experience our way not theire way...

Now with we already have something whic is incompatible BTW as I mentioned does it mean that adding a new one is such a pain in the developers backside? Or is this a close minded users point of view?

If you don't like how things work why don't you make your own plug-in? or even much better, your own messenger compatible with everything? maybe you could make something better than Microsoft, or Patchou, who was worked in this for many yearse

I think encryption should be built into plus and the default setting is on

quote:

---

Originally posted by robert_dll
If you don't like how things work why don't you make your own plug-in? or even much better, your own messenger compatible with everything? maybe you could make something better than Microsoft, or Patchou, who was worked in this for many yearse

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by john-t
I think encryption should be built into plus and the default setting is on

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by X3_
You know if I could code I would do a lot more than that for sure

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by X3_
Im just suggesting yet something more powerfull and main stream yet I keep getting this anti implementation of OTR....

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by X3_
you dont work for Microsoft do you? only those guys are that blind to innovation...

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Spunky

quote:

---

Originally posted by john-t
I think encryption should be built into plus and the default setting is on

---

And just how would your contact's decode it without Plus!?

---

its not a demand its a suggestion like many other that have been suugested and taken on board OTR FYI is windows ready and works flawlessly it just really needs integrating into either the like of Pidin/miranda or even dare I be so bold to suggest it here.

I dont expect patchou to do anything in fact but he does and hes provided a great tool used by millions its a shame you above all else since your not against why not just wonder why not instead of picking at whatever I say.

Coding easy? OK if you are a coder do yu a deal Ill teach you CCNA, 3D Gfx Desig, Photoshop and on CCNA how ro configure routers ACL's Switches and whole gigantic networks and you will teach me coding...

Try to configure a Cisco 2800 and other routers from start to finish CLI and the turn another router into a super firewall and then come back to me...

Coding easy sure I hardly have the time to snease, Im part of open source projects like uVNC commercial projects like flashfxp I beta test hardware and sofwrae for Acronis, linksys, Dlink, Cisco and I have a real live...

Eh... maybe I should bother with comments like yours or even bothering trying to suggest something slighly useful jsut to avoid this sort of animosity. Jesus.

Im stressed enough without this crap...

Can messenger plus JavaScript access DLLs?

If Seems like you could make a JavaScript wrapper add on. Then you could get what you want.

yes they can

great news unfortnatly Im not a coder so thers that one gone...

If anyone would do this it would be a great addition to Live+

quote:

---

Originally posted by X3_
great news unfortnatly Im not a coder so thers that one gone...

If anyone would do this it would be a great addition to Live+

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by john-t

quote:

---

Originally posted by Spunky

quote:

---

Originally posted by john-t
I think encryption should be built into plus and the default setting is on

---

And just how would your contact's decode it without Plus!?

---

It's only encrypted if the contact has plus Obv.

---

Actually, simp (a Messenger encryption addon I suggested earlier in this thread) has no trouble detecting whether the other user also has it and handling the key exchange, completely transparently.  There are no visible "pings" or any other indications, regardless whether you have it or not.

If you don't have it and I do, it has several ways to alert me that our conversation won't be encrypted (including tray notifications, changing your text color and appending an indicator to your nickname).  You don't see anything.

If we both have simp, the first time we message each other it will present us with the signature of the other person's key and ask to accept or decline.  It will detect and warn me if your key ever changes -- that way I can know if someone else has stolen your account, as they would be using a different key.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Adeptus
Actually, simp (a Messenger encryption addon I suggested earlier in this thread) has no trouble detecting whether the other user also has it and handling the key exchange, completely transparently. 

---

I'm working on an OTR script for Messenger Plus right now. I've got Key Exchange working, and once I get AES working theres only a few bugs to kill and I'm good to go

quote:

---

Originally posted by XgD
I'm working on an OTR script for Messenger Plus right now. I've got Key Exchange working, and once I get AES working theres only a few bugs to kill and I'm good to go

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by XgD
I'm working on an OTR script for Messenger Plus right now. I've got Key Exchange working, and once I get AES working theres only a few bugs to kill and I'm good to go

---

is this still being worked on or what?  with privacy becoming more and more important this should be on the very top of the scripts list

well nobody interested or what

is this a dead project or what?

quote:

---

Originally posted by hentailoli
is this a dead project or what?

---

damn shouldve known it was too good to be true ....

Look what I found: [Release] Off The Record - IM Encryption - v0.13

Unfortunately the link in the thread no longer works.

yeah and the protocol version of otr is outdated ive sent him an email not sure if hes gona reply thou after him being inactive for so long