quote:
Originally posted by steVenB
t is obvious too see that the actions of the American Government on the invasion of Iraq can be seen as an act of terrorism.
No. Because terrorism is like in the definition you quoted, "employing terror as a political wepon". And the invaision of iraqi did not use terror tactics to remove sadam hussain, they attacked key military targets (although the did mess up sometimes) to overthrow his regieme, which as it happened involved many of his people living in terror of him, hence him having political power.
quote:
Originally posted by steVenB
The only difference being that the American Governement has million dollar weapons to play with.
No. If terrorists used a million dollar weapon to blow up civilian targets and to incite terror it would still be terrorism wouldnt it?