What happened to the Messenger Plus! forums on msghelp.net?
Shoutbox » MsgHelp Archive » Messenger Plus! for Live Messenger » WLM Plus! General » I think we should have a new sticky..

I think we should have a new sticky..
Author: Message:
CookieRevised
Elite Member
*****

Avatar

Posts: 15517
Reputation: 173
– / Male / Flag
Joined: Jul 2003
Status: Away
RE: RE: I think we should have a new sticky..
quote:
Originally posted by NiteMare
your forgeting, we're not talking about everybody, we're talking about people that don't search, don't read other posts, and just go striaght to posting a new thread and asking for it
We (at least I am) ARE talking about everybody.

The people you talk about are a minority, despite what you might think. And even if we are only talking for us, it would be also usefull for "us" only.

There are always people who don't search, but there are far less people who don't search AND don't look at a very first thread title AND don't read other threads AND just clicking on "New Thread".

As I said, if it saves 1 new thread out of every 10 new threads then it is worth while....

I seriously can not understand why you should not create such a sticky thread. There is no reason at all to not do it.

quote:
Originally posted by NiteMare
stickys won't make a difference, because if they went to the proper forum, were the sticky would be located, there is most likly already another thread there asking for plus!live, if they don't read that thread, what make you so sure they would read a sticky
I'm sure that not everybody is going to read it, and I also did not say or suggested that duplicated threads would be something from the past; they will always exist. But it isn't because 5 absolute n00bs don't read such a thread that nobody does.

People do not search because searching is an "art" so to speak, you wont always have result strait away, it takes time, etc. A sticky thread doesn't need to be searched...

Again, I really, really do not understand why a sticky should not be created and what is so bad about a sticky. It has nothing than advantages, there are no disadvantages at all ([sarcastic]other than maybe he/she who create it must actually make a new thread... whoooooo hard labor... we rather make spam threads...[/sarcastic])



quote:
Originally posted by simsgenius
because the people who ask that question don't read a thing and just come marching in asking and wait for an answer cause they're too lazy to look.
So? Again: what is the problem in having a sticky then? If everybody still comes marching in, you simply can link to the sticky.

Advantages:
- people have all the info at once (beta testers are choosen, is closed beta, release when finished, blahblah)
- no need for a thread with 10 posts and still not all the info. 1 reply and report the thread for closure, finished...
- you don't need to write anything in reply, just the link and "please read this" or "here is all the info you want"

In fact, a sticky means that you, as a helper, can be lazy and yet still helping people out...


---------------

And for those who claim that stickies don't work...

Take a look at when the "Blockcheckers do not work" thread was created and also look at its amount of views. Threads about blockcheckers dropped rapidly (of course from time to time people still make a thread of it, but that's to be expected, at least there aren't constantly threads about it anymore. Like it was before that sticky)...

Same with all the other existing stickies...

This post was edited on 03-19-2006 at 01:40 AM by CookieRevised.
.-= A 'frrrrrrrituurrr' for Wacky =-.
03-19-2006 01:08 AM
Profile PM Find Quote Report
« Next Oldest Return to Top Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread
I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Poom on 03-18-2006 at 07:08 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Mnjul on 03-18-2006 at 08:18 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by CookieRevised on 03-18-2006 at 08:29 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by albert on 03-18-2006 at 01:17 PM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by qgroessl on 03-18-2006 at 01:19 PM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by lordy on 03-18-2006 at 01:20 PM
RE: RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by CookieRevised on 03-19-2006 at 12:49 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Nathan on 03-18-2006 at 01:31 PM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by user27089 on 03-18-2006 at 01:33 PM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Nathan on 03-18-2006 at 01:35 PM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Menthix on 03-18-2006 at 01:37 PM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by NiteMare on 03-18-2006 at 04:28 PM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by GiantSpider on 03-18-2006 at 05:12 PM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by John Anderton on 03-18-2006 at 05:14 PM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by NiteMare on 03-18-2006 at 08:09 PM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Voldemort on 03-18-2006 at 08:09 PM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by NiteMare on 03-18-2006 at 08:37 PM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Reaper on 03-18-2006 at 08:46 PM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by NiteMare on 03-18-2006 at 08:56 PM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Voldemort on 03-18-2006 at 08:56 PM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by NiteMare on 03-18-2006 at 08:57 PM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Wabz on 03-18-2006 at 09:03 PM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by NiteMare on 03-18-2006 at 11:23 PM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by NiteMare on 03-19-2006 at 12:54 AM
RE: RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by CookieRevised on 03-19-2006 at 01:08 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by albert on 03-19-2006 at 12:59 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by simsgenius on 03-19-2006 at 01:05 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by NiteMare on 03-19-2006 at 01:55 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Chrono on 03-19-2006 at 03:35 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by NiteMare on 03-19-2006 at 04:24 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Discrate on 03-19-2006 at 08:00 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by NiteMare on 03-19-2006 at 08:18 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Poom on 03-19-2006 at 09:26 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Menthix on 03-19-2006 at 10:50 AM
RE: RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Poom on 03-19-2006 at 11:59 AM
RE: RE: RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by CookieRevised on 03-19-2006 at 01:37 PM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Menthix on 03-19-2006 at 01:39 PM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Chrono on 03-19-2006 at 07:56 PM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by NiteMare on 03-20-2006 at 03:34 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Chrono on 03-20-2006 at 03:39 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by NiteMare on 03-20-2006 at 03:53 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Chrono on 03-20-2006 at 04:02 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Hank on 03-20-2006 at 04:05 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Chrono on 03-20-2006 at 04:16 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by NiteMare on 03-20-2006 at 04:24 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Hank on 03-20-2006 at 04:26 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Chrono on 03-20-2006 at 04:26 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by NiteMare on 03-20-2006 at 04:35 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Hank on 03-20-2006 at 05:14 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Menthix on 03-20-2006 at 05:54 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by NiteMare on 03-20-2006 at 06:06 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by lordy on 03-20-2006 at 06:08 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by NiteMare on 03-20-2006 at 06:10 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by lordy on 03-20-2006 at 06:12 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by NiteMare on 03-20-2006 at 06:15 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by lordy on 03-20-2006 at 06:16 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by NiteMare on 03-20-2006 at 06:18 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Dane on 03-20-2006 at 06:19 AM
RE: RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by NiteMare on 03-20-2006 at 06:21 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by lordy on 03-20-2006 at 06:19 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by WDZ on 03-20-2006 at 06:35 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by NiteMare on 03-20-2006 at 06:40 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by WDZ on 03-20-2006 at 06:51 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by NiteMare on 03-20-2006 at 06:56 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by lordy on 03-20-2006 at 07:01 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by NiteMare on 03-20-2006 at 07:03 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by lordy on 03-20-2006 at 07:05 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by NiteMare on 03-20-2006 at 07:10 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by WDZ on 03-20-2006 at 07:23 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by NiteMare on 03-20-2006 at 07:29 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by matty on 03-20-2006 at 07:30 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by WDZ on 03-20-2006 at 07:37 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Panic! on 03-20-2006 at 08:02 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by NiteMare on 03-20-2006 at 08:22 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Plik on 03-20-2006 at 08:33 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by -dt- on 03-20-2006 at 08:37 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Plik on 03-20-2006 at 08:47 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by -dt- on 03-20-2006 at 09:05 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Poom on 03-20-2006 at 09:52 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Pyroteq on 03-20-2006 at 10:17 AM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by qgroessl on 03-20-2006 at 12:25 PM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by NiteMare on 03-20-2006 at 04:33 PM
RE: I think we should have a new sticky.. - by Chrono on 03-20-2006 at 05:22 PM


Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
View a Printable Version
Send this Thread to a Friend
Subscribe | Add to Favorites
Rate This Thread:

Forum Jump:

Forum Rules:
You cannot post new threads
You cannot post replies
You cannot post attachments
You can edit your posts
HTML is Off
myCode is On
Smilies are On
[img] Code is On