quote:
Originally posted by Nagamasa
quote:
Originally posted by Microway (what he crossed off)
Ohh... I was forgeting: maybe we could choose some people (the older ones here) to judge the reputation, but maybe it's difficult.
Perhaps there should be a panel which includes admins, mods, and elites which votes for rep count. I mean, they are special for a reason, and I'm sure they can be honest. But then, it might be A LOT of work for them to rep each and every member...
That's why I crossed it off... The people choosed would have a lot of unecessary work + they have more important things to do...
To be more honest here, all theads about reputation started with sugestions and discutions, but as soon as they come, after days, they "disapear" from the firsts pages on the "Latest Posts" because this is a subject that in the end, people get in conclusion that the best is to keep the system as it is. So, the best thing is continue with the Reputation System (as Cookie said: The system is not the problem) and try to LEARN how do you can remove an unfair reputation vote.
Again: Search for other threads about reputation and you'll see what some people that don't want to change system and me are talking about...
PS: Search made using "Reputation" and only on subjects
/ 
