What happened to the Messenger Plus! forums on msghelp.net?
Shoutbox » MsgHelp Archive » Skype & Technology » Skype & Live Messenger » Taking away display names is HORRIBLE.

Taking away display names is HORRIBLE.
Author: Message:
Butcher_ss
Junior Member
**


Posts: 57
38 / Male / Flag
Joined: Mar 2004
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE.
On the contrary, by not releasing on XP what are they doing (i am referring to the new version of WLM)? Promoting Vista and Windows 7. Windows XP is not making any more sales at the moment and by not releasing this a person who wants this will either switch to Vista/7 or not install it.

If that person wants better synchronisation with Facecrap they have to upgrade. Again, promoting Vista/7. The reason this policy was changed was as previously mentioned to allow better synchronisation but why wasn't it offered on XP as well since more users have XP than Vista/7?

Because promoting a new product on a system that people already have will not bring them money. Same thing why they will not be releasing IE9 on XP, most people already have XP but if they want the new toys they have to get a new OS>>> More money.

The display name policy was changed so that there is better synchronisation and so on. What does that mean? People will be using WLM for more than just a single chat program. Using WLM for more purposes than just chat means that WLM will be used more if it provides more services. Correct? And what does WLM have? ADS. Meaning if more people use a product, then it means that more people will be seeing the Ads that the program has, hence the Ads just became more expensive>>More money.

Simple economics.
11-02-2010 12:44 PM
Profile E-Mail PM Find Quote Report
« Next Oldest Return to Top Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread
Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by spvn on 10-01-2010 at 02:04 PM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by Chrissy on 10-01-2010 at 02:50 PM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by CookieRevised on 10-01-2010 at 02:58 PM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by blackjack on 10-01-2010 at 03:39 PM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by CookieRevised on 10-01-2010 at 03:50 PM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by blackjack on 10-01-2010 at 04:01 PM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by Chrono on 10-01-2010 at 05:59 PM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by spvn on 10-02-2010 at 02:18 AM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by Chris4 on 10-02-2010 at 06:39 AM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by CookieRevised on 10-02-2010 at 07:44 AM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by Chris4 on 10-02-2010 at 07:57 AM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by CookieRevised on 10-02-2010 at 08:38 AM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by alisclow on 10-03-2010 at 01:09 PM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by dbgarza on 10-04-2010 at 08:02 AM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by Yugo on 10-07-2010 at 07:59 PM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by ahmetgns on 10-07-2010 at 08:44 PM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by CookieRevised on 10-08-2010 at 11:33 AM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by V@no on 10-21-2010 at 12:51 PM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by TwistedAlice on 10-27-2010 at 07:35 PM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by b-adam on 10-31-2010 at 02:05 PM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by CookieRevised on 10-31-2010 at 05:59 PM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by Butcher_ss on 11-01-2010 at 07:23 PM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by CookieRevised on 11-01-2010 at 07:34 PM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by Butcher_ss on 11-02-2010 at 12:44 PM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by CookieRevised on 11-02-2010 at 01:22 PM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by andyo on 11-03-2010 at 11:47 AM
RE: RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by Yugo on 11-04-2010 at 05:20 PM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by Menthix on 11-03-2010 at 04:58 PM
RE: RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by andyo on 11-04-2010 at 12:55 PM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by Chris4 on 11-03-2010 at 05:04 PM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by andyo on 11-07-2010 at 07:43 AM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by haishama on 02-02-2011 at 10:37 PM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by Butcher_ss on 02-24-2011 at 06:42 PM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by djdannyp on 02-25-2011 at 08:44 AM
RE: Taking away display names is HORRIBLE. - by Butcher_ss on 03-03-2011 at 09:03 AM


Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
View a Printable Version
Send this Thread to a Friend
Subscribe | Add to Favorites
Rate This Thread:

Forum Jump:

Forum Rules:
You cannot post new threads
You cannot post replies
You cannot post attachments
You can edit your posts
HTML is Off
myCode is On
Smilies are On
[img] Code is On