Search Results |
Subject |
Author |
Forum |
Time |
RE: Tiny bug Anyway, Patchou? | ViVa | WLM Plus! Bug Reports | 04-13-2005 at 05:41 PM |
RE: Tiny bug @ Leo, I don't know math? :') I was being sarcastic to Scone in case you didn't notice. @ Milennium_edition, finally someone who understands my point. No, it might not be a Messenger Plus! bug, but still I think Patchou should change it to 5.1.260... | ViVa | WLM Plus! Bug Reports | 04-12-2005 at 06:49 PM |
RE: Tiny bug Yes you are right, zero's are meaningless. So basically Windows XP is version 5.1.26 of NT and not 5.1.2600. |-) But to make a long story short, Patchou will you fix this matter? | ViVa | WLM Plus! Bug Reports | 04-12-2005 at 01:46 PM |
RE: Tiny bug 5.01.2600 IS NOT the true version number of Windows XP! | ViVa | WLM Plus! Bug Reports | 04-12-2005 at 01:15 PM |
RE: Tiny bug Before we go any further, you agree on the Windows cmd part, the Messenger Plus! About part and the Messenger Plus! webpage part (where patchou himself named its release without the 0)? I'm just wondering why (!VER) does show the additional zeros, ... | ViVa | WLM Plus! Bug Reports | 04-12-2005 at 12:36 PM |
RE: Tiny bug Sorry if I were rude, that wasn't my intention. The thing Sypher says, I think my point has been made about that, Windows XP IS in fact NT [b]5.1[/b]. Secondly, the About menu of Messenger Plus! AND the webpage tell me 3.51.128. A. Madsen, that addi... | ViVa | WLM Plus! Bug Reports | 04-12-2005 at 12:06 PM |
RE: Tiny bug No they absolutely don't, what makes you think that? Can you show me any proof of that? I don't think you can, because I double checked. This is a bug. .edit, don't make me go make screenshots to proof I'm right. :^) | ViVa | WLM Plus! Bug Reports | 04-12-2005 at 10:59 AM |
Tiny bug Hey all, Since this is my first post to the Messenger Plus! Forums, I'm not sure if this already has been mentioned before. I'm wondering why the version numbers of the (!VER) command are still shown wrongly. Windows XP IS in fact [b]5.1.2600[/b],... | ViVa | WLM Plus! Bug Reports | 04-12-2005 at 10:34 AM |