| Search Results |
| Subject |
Author |
Forum |
Time |
RE: Can't remember the name of this script
You mean [url]http://www.msgplus.net/Downloads/Download-Det ails/DocumentID/8306/[/url]? | SmokingCookie | Scripting | 09-03-2011 at 07:53 AM |
RE: [?] navigator.appVersion with BrowserControl
Thread-bump: I think I should let y'all know that I've found an alternative: [code=JScript]/* This is code executed by Plus! */ var document = WndInternet.Browser_GetInterface("BrowserCtrl"). document; var window = document.parentWindow; // This i... | SmokingCookie | Scripting | 06-25-2011 at 03:35 PM |
RE: [?] navigator.appVersion with BrowserControl
This: [url=http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff974 775%28VS.85%29.aspx]document.defaultView[/url] | SmokingCookie | Scripting | 05-28-2011 at 04:59 PM |
[?] navigator.appVersion with BrowserControl
Well, I've done some experimenting with the browser control lately, and I've figured out that it uses IE 7.0. However, I've got IE 9.0 installed. I've used the following statement in a BrowserControl and in IE 9: [code=javascript]javascript:alert... | SmokingCookie | Scripting | 05-28-2011 at 03:57 PM |
RE: [beta] Voicemail 1.0 (released 12/08/2011)
I don't think so. I've tried various sizes and positions, it just keeps disappearing off the screen. It moves to the bottom-right corner of the screen. Dunno if you're into physics, but it seems like an [i]accelerated[/i] motion: it starts off slo... | SmokingCookie | Scripting | 05-08-2011 at 05:07 PM |
RE: [beta] Voicemail 1.0 (released 12/08/2011)
I've tried your code with only one chat window open and tabs disabled completely. Still, the window goes off-screen. The direction seems random though. The chat window moves off-screen in a direction that is a multiple of 45 degrees. | SmokingCookie | Scripting | 05-08-2011 at 03:23 PM |
RE: [beta] Voicemail 1.0 (released 12/08/2011)
Cookie's code works just fine :) @Whiz: your code moves the chat window downward, off the screen :P | SmokingCookie | Scripting | 05-08-2011 at 07:42 AM |
RE: Call ASM routine from your script (with example)
I see what y'all mean, but I was actually wondering what the effect of the ASM stuff is on the "Hello world!" string. I mean: the input is the same as the output? And I think this ASM is quite a bit too abstract to make up yourself, right? @matty:... | SmokingCookie | Scripting | 05-02-2011 at 07:18 PM |
RE: Call ASM routine from your script (with example)
Okay, you win (again...) :p But what does the ASM thing do? In other words: what is this? [code=JScript]var sASM = "\u8B55\u244C\u8B10\u2454\u8B0C\u246C\u660 8\uB60F\u0045\u8966\u4502\u4242\uF3E2\uC25D \u0010";[/code] And how did you m... | SmokingCookie | Scripting | 05-02-2011 at 06:45 PM |
RE: Call ASM routine from your script (with example)
Wow, nice explanation :O Unfortunately, it doesn't work :P If I create BinaryData as follows: [code=JScript]var Text = "Hello world!"; var BinaryData = Interop.Allocate((Text.length + 1) * 2); BinaryData.writeSTRING(0,Text);[/code] Then the debugg... | SmokingCookie | Scripting | 05-02-2011 at 01:46 PM |
RE: [released] XTC koffieshop (i.e. Dutch-participle helper)
That's what I thought too when it was working :P I know about the pronunciation rule, but not everyone does. That's why I wrote the core function in the first place (and I never intended to release :P ). "Faxen" does indeed work (omg who uses fax... | SmokingCookie | Scripting | 05-02-2011 at 01:12 PM |
RE: [?] Calling a procedure by its address
Now that's a useful thing! But there's a snake in the grass: CallWindowProc() allows up to four parameters. So I'd think that this will only work for procedures that take exactly four parameters. However, please do correct me if I'm wrong :P Edit... | SmokingCookie | Scripting | 05-01-2011 at 05:48 PM |
RE: [released] XTC koffieshop (i.e. Dutch-participle helper)
Yeah I know.. But I've spent a couple of hours straight trying to think of a verb base ending on c or h, but haven't really succeeded yet :P | SmokingCookie | Scripting | 05-01-2011 at 05:42 PM |
[?] Calling a procedure by its address
I've got a big secret project that I'm working on, but I'm kinda stuck. The thing is: I know the address of a certain procedure in a process - let's say CreateWindowExW() - and I want to call the function by its address, rather than through Inter... | SmokingCookie | Scripting | 05-01-2011 at 04:00 PM |
[released] XTC koffieshop (i.e. Dutch-participle helper)
First of all: no, this ain't about XTC, coffee shops or or anything drugs-related :P I almost hear you thinking: well, what [i]is[/i] it then? Well, let me give you some background: a friend of mine once asked me whether some Dutch participle was su... | SmokingCookie | Scripting | 05-01-2011 at 01:41 PM |
RE: [?] GetProcAddress and LoadLibraryW
Got it working, thanks :D | SmokingCookie | Scripting | 04-10-2011 at 08:25 AM |
[?] GetProcAddress and LoadLibraryW
Wow I've been away for a LOOOOOOOONG time man :| Anyways, I'm having trouble getting GetProcAddress to do what I want. I've managed to have it return a valid (and the right) address value for the ordinal value associated with LoadLibraryW, but it ... | SmokingCookie | Scripting | 04-09-2011 at 07:17 PM |
RE: Skinning & scripting
That's a good possibility indeed. But adding UI elements like skinning does; is that possible too? | SmokingCookie | Scripting | 03-20-2011 at 12:23 PM |
RE: Skinning & scripting
So, is there a hard way of doing it without the dynamic skinning in Yuna's terms? :P | SmokingCookie | Scripting | 03-20-2011 at 10:54 AM |
RE: Skinning & scripting
Actually, the toast thing doesn't really answer my question - no offence though. What I meant, was that I'd like to [i]dynamically[/i] (i.e. through a script) add stuff to the Messenger windows, without restarting it. | SmokingCookie | Scripting | 03-20-2011 at 09:57 AM |
Skinning & scripting
First of all: this could arguably be placed in the Skinning section too, but I just stick to Scripting on this one :P I heard rumors that Plus! 5 has or will have dynamic skinning functionalities. Is it possible to provide such stuff to the scripting... | SmokingCookie | Scripting | 03-19-2011 at 01:54 PM |
RE: Plus! 5 General Release (official)
So, this version can be considered to be [i]kind of[/i] a public beta? :P (without the bugs a normal PB would be packed with :P ) | SmokingCookie | Announcements & News | 02-16-2011 at 08:10 PM |
RE: Plus! 5 General Release (official)
So apparently the scripting system hasn't been changed [s]a lot[/s] at all? Maybe it's a good time to update the scripting documentation for the first time since March 2009 :P | SmokingCookie | Announcements & News | 02-16-2011 at 06:03 PM |
RE: Changelog?
All right, I'll be patient then :P | SmokingCookie | WLM Plus! General | 02-13-2011 at 10:40 AM |
Changelog?
Well, I've searched the website and took a look around the forums, but I haven't found the changelog for Plus! 5 yet. [size=1]Tbh, I'm only interested in the changes to the scripting engine.[/size] | SmokingCookie | WLM Plus! General | 02-13-2011 at 10:32 AM |