Shoutbox

Log viewer suggestion + bug(?) - Printable Version

-Shoutbox (https://shoutbox.menthix.net)
+-- Forum: MsgHelp Archive (/forumdisplay.php?fid=58)
+--- Forum: Messenger Plus! for Live Messenger (/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+---- Forum: WLM Plus! General (/forumdisplay.php?fid=23)
+----- Thread: Log viewer suggestion + bug(?) (/showthread.php?tid=86192)

Log viewer suggestion + bug(?) by andrey on 09-27-2008 at 11:01 PM

First the suggestion: I just opened the log viewer and noticed that I now have logs from 2006 to 2008 saved in there, one folder per month.
Why aren't those log folders sorted chronologically ? In my opinion that would be the better (in terms of user friendliness) choice than sorting them alphabetically in the tree view.

To visualize:

Current (Alphabetical order)              Better (Chronological order)
[Image: logview-abcsort2.png]     [Image: logview-chronsort2.png]



And now the other thing I noticed was that on a PC running a 'german' Windows XP with the English version of WLM installed and the Interface Language set to English in the Messenger Plus! Preferences, the chat logs are still saved in folders named after the german months ('Januar', 'Februar', 'März',... instead of 'January', 'February', 'March'...). Not sure if this can be classified as bug, I consider it a minor inconsistency, just something I noticed.


RE: Log viewer suggestion + bug(?) by Vilkku on 09-27-2008 at 11:08 PM

I've thought about the sorting of the chat log folders as well, and my suggestion would be to use a different naming system, so that when you sort them by name they would be sorted properly, my suggestion is <year>-<month> - <month name>, so it could look like "2007-01 January". Why not an option to customize the way the folders are named?


RE: Log viewer suggestion + bug(?) by djdannyp on 09-27-2008 at 11:21 PM

Feature request: Log file naming
Chat Logging by Month, Language is mixed up
Log Viewer - sorting and inconsistencies
Log Viewer month's order (beta testers only)
Log Viewer (beta testers only)

it's been discussed once or twice before :P

i'd definitely love it to be done like that, but apparently it's a limitation for a variety of reasons (best pointed out by cookie in at least one of the above threads)


RE: Log viewer suggestion + bug(?) by andrey on 09-27-2008 at 11:26 PM

Blah, I only noticed those threads when I had already posted this one :p
I guess I'll search before posting next time, not afterwards. :rolleyes:


RE: Log viewer suggestion + bug(?) by mezzanine on 09-28-2008 at 12:28 PM

I complained about that a while ago aswell. And frankly, it being a technical limitation is not an excuse. It's a serious design flaw. =p


RE: Log viewer suggestion + bug(?) by morphene on 02-24-2009 at 04:04 PM

Hmm, based on what I've read in previous threads, I'm surprised this issue is that hard to correct . . . .

There REALLY should be a way to address this problem.

I was wondering by any chance this issue could be database related?


RE: RE: Log viewer suggestion + bug(?) by djdannyp on 02-24-2009 at 04:25 PM

quote:
Originally posted by morphene
Hmm, based on what I've read in previous threads, I'm surprised this issue is that hard to correct . . . .

There REALLY should be a way to address this problem.

I was wondering by any chance this issue could be database related?

no, as there's no database involved......the problem arises with the way that windows orders folders.....the only way around it is to change the way your log folders get named (possible by registry editing iirc) to yyyy-mm and then they can be ordered chronologically by sorting by name
RE: Log viewer suggestion + bug(?) by Patchou on 02-25-2009 at 11:27 PM

I'll try to do something for the next version.


RE: Log viewer suggestion + bug(?) by ShawnZ on 02-25-2009 at 11:51 PM

quote:
Originally posted by djdannyp
no, as there's no database involved......the problem arises with the way that windows orders folders.....the only way around it is to change the way your log folders get named (possible by registry editing iirc) to yyyy-mm and then they can be ordered chronologically by sorting by name

or it could just be coded to sort them chronologically....
RE: Log viewer suggestion + bug(?) by Patchou on 02-26-2009 at 01:29 AM

done :). That will be part of Plus! 4.81 which will be released in March.


RE: Log viewer suggestion + bug(?) by robert_dll on 02-26-2009 at 02:41 AM

quote:
Originally posted by Patchou
done :). That will be part of Plus! 4.81 which will be released in March.
For those who read this, I hope you understand it could be until March 31th, not March 1st, right Patchou? :P so don't start complaining if it is not released at the beginning of the month.
RE: Log viewer suggestion + bug(?) by morphene on 02-26-2009 at 06:34 AM

Wow, that fast? Now this I'm impressed . . . .

Thank you very much for addressing this problem. Appreciate any knowledge provided as well.

Keep up the great work, Patchou! :D