What happened to the Messenger Plus! forums on msghelp.net?
Shoutbox » MsgHelp Archive » Skype & Technology » Tech Talk » new network with dedicated dhcp/dns

new network with dedicated dhcp/dns
Author: Message:
Jarrod
Veteran Member
*****

Avatar
woot simpson

Posts: 1304
Reputation: 20
– / Male / Flag
Joined: Sep 2006
O.P. new network with dedicated dhcp/dns
so I want to reconstruct my network
to look something like this
[Image: attachment.php?pid=985476]

will I run into problems having the dhcp server set up not on the  modem?

and I'm thinking of using fedora for this role of dhcp/dns, does anyone have any better suggestions?

.png File Attachment: network diagram.PNG (31.54 KB)
This file has been downloaded 287 time(s).

This post was edited on 01-19-2010 at 11:22 PM by Jarrod.

[Image: 5344.png]
[Image: sig.png]

A.k.a. The Glad Falconer














01-19-2010 11:14 PM
Profile E-Mail PM Find Quote Report
wj
Former Admin
*****

Avatar
I aim to misbehave.

Posts: 2224
Reputation: 52
37 / – / Flag
Joined: Mar 2002
RE: new network with dedicated dhcp/dns
No problems as long as it's handing out 192.168.1.1 as the default gateway and 192.168.1.2 as the dns address.

Why not just have the OSX Server do DHCP and DNS?

This post was edited on 01-19-2010 at 11:59 PM by wj.
"A towel is about the most massively useful
thing an interstellar hitchhiker can have."
01-19-2010 11:59 PM
Profile PM Find Quote Report
Adeptus
Senior Member
****


Posts: 732
Reputation: 40
Joined: Oct 2005
RE: new network with dedicated dhcp/dns
As wj says, it will be fine.  It's a standard configuration for small Windows AD networks, because Active Directory absolutely requires dynamic DNS updates.  You will have to decide whether you want the DNS server to handle recursion (actually resolve things itself) or maintain a valid list of forwarders (Your ISP's DNS servers, 8.8.8.8 etc.), but neither is particularly hard to set up.

As wj says again, why not just let the OS X server do it?  It could do your web serving too.  You would have to have thousands (or more likely tens of thousands) of clients to justify dedicated hardware for DNS/DHCP, so separating these functions is quite unnecessary -- unless you are just doing it for experimental and learning purposes.

Lastly, I recommend using a different RFC 1918 address block than the ridiculously common 192.168.1.*.  The problem with that is everybody uses it and if at any point you want to VPN to somebody else's network or do something similar, that is your best bet for a routing conflict.
01-20-2010 12:58 AM
Profile E-Mail PM Find Quote Report
Jarrod
Veteran Member
*****

Avatar
woot simpson

Posts: 1304
Reputation: 20
– / Male / Flag
Joined: Sep 2006
O.P. RE: new network with dedicated dhcp/dns
well learning was the main objective but not the only desired outcome.

Basically I wanted to set up my own DNS so I can have internal address mappings for machines which don't support netbios.

I was considering setting up DNS on OSX Server but then I couldn't find any instructions to set it up with dhcp, and I wanted to have both on the same server, and thought taking the load off the OSX box was a good Idea, considering it will be busy serving media and video and what not.

The reason the osx box wasn't going to host http as well was (well it is but) mainly due to the fact that the box will be connected to a tv and controlled via vlc server, the osx box will do http but only internal stuff

[Image: 5344.png]
[Image: sig.png]

A.k.a. The Glad Falconer














01-20-2010 03:03 AM
Profile E-Mail PM Find Quote Report
« Next Oldest Return to Top Next Newest »


Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
View a Printable Version
Send this Thread to a Friend
Subscribe | Add to Favorites
Rate This Thread:

Forum Jump:

Forum Rules:
You cannot post new threads
You cannot post replies
You cannot post attachments
You can edit your posts
HTML is Off
myCode is On
Smilies are On
[img] Code is On