quote:
Originally posted by KeyStormnAnyway, they're wasting names and messing up statistics, a non-poster is not a member, because s/he doesn't participate in the forums in any way, usually. So all member stats shouldn't consider all non-posters
Messing up statistics? If anything they add to its accuracy. It shows many other stats, not just posting. Male/Female; Ages; Ratings... without all those other members we'd just have a less gernal view because we only take the posting peoples stats.
IMO, pruning all non-active members is stupid.
/ 
