What happened to the Messenger Plus! forums on msghelp.net?
Shoutbox » MsgHelp Archive » Messenger Plus! for Live Messenger » WLM Plus! General » Plus! auto detection

Plus! auto detection
Author: Message:
CookieRevised
Elite Member
*****

Avatar

Posts: 15519
Reputation: 173
– / Male / Flag
Joined: Jul 2003
Status: Away
RE: Plus! auto detection
Stop trying to find reasons to add/change it... It wont be done for all the reasons that we've already pointed out.


It can't be compared with the webcam option in Messenger. This option is already part of Messenger, and there is still a huge difference between something that is already part of a software and something that is added by a 3rd party. Privacy IS an issue here...

If it was added in a hidden way, then Plus! sends packets behind the back of the user. This IS a privacy breach. Even if the other contact has disabled the return of the ping, the packet is still send to that user. And THAT is were the privacy issue is. Plus! is already called spyware sometimes (without any reasons). If this is added in this way, then there are reasons to call it that. (I know there is still a difference, but that is what those people are looking for: lame excuses to call it spyware: "hey, I discovered that it sends hidden info"...)

Also, the thing above can be done in several ways: using the current protocol, or using a P2P method. Both methods are out of the question for Plus!. Plus! will never temper with the protocol (like other addons). It is suppose to be a "clean"/"non-invasive" addon. The P2P method is also out of the question because of the reason that Matty gave: Patchou wont add a dirty winsock-layer method to do this.

Also, don't forget the fact that people will not always have Plus!. Their Messenger should be able to handle the send "packet" without "beeping" up. If something is send to someone without Plus! they can say, again, that something is sending dodgy things to them (=again privacy issue and also the "dodgy software" factor).

So, how to do it in a clean way? By sending a textmessage... And text can't be hidden. And even if it could, it wouldn't be a nice thing to do...

Like Matty already said: all the methods available have been discussed before this was added. And this is the best, cleanest and proper way...
.-= A 'frrrrrrrituurrr' for Wacky =-.
10-14-2004 10:59 PM
Profile PM Find Quote Report
« Next Oldest Return to Top Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread
Plus! auto detection - by riahc4 on 10-04-2004 at 06:06 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by Plik on 10-04-2004 at 06:19 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by riahc4 on 10-04-2004 at 06:30 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by Millenium_edition on 10-04-2004 at 06:31 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by riahc4 on 10-04-2004 at 07:03 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by aNILEator on 10-04-2004 at 07:04 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by CookieRevised on 10-05-2004 at 12:38 AM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by aptiva on 10-06-2004 at 12:38 AM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by CookieRevised on 10-06-2004 at 12:55 AM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by riahc4 on 10-12-2004 at 03:35 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by stuartbennett on 10-12-2004 at 09:23 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by gnownoskcid on 10-12-2004 at 11:54 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by patrick on 10-13-2004 at 05:05 AM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by Pyroteq on 10-13-2004 at 06:30 AM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by gnownoskcid on 10-13-2004 at 06:37 AM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by stuartbennett on 10-13-2004 at 06:54 AM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by gnownoskcid on 10-13-2004 at 07:01 AM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by stuartbennett on 10-13-2004 at 07:16 AM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by riahc4 on 10-14-2004 at 03:04 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by matty on 10-14-2004 at 04:20 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by _Humphreys on 10-14-2004 at 06:58 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by riahc4 on 10-14-2004 at 08:20 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by stuartbennett on 10-14-2004 at 09:05 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by CookieRevised on 10-14-2004 at 10:59 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by gnownoskcid on 10-14-2004 at 11:23 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by stuartbennett on 10-15-2004 at 07:46 AM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by riahc4 on 10-18-2004 at 04:06 PM
RE: RE: Plus! auto detection - by CookieRevised on 10-18-2004 at 08:53 PM
RE: RE: RE: Plus! auto detection - by riahc4 on 10-19-2004 at 03:32 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by Millenium_edition on 10-18-2004 at 05:02 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by Millenium_edition on 10-19-2004 at 04:20 PM
RE: RE: RE: RE: Plus! auto detection - by CookieRevised on 10-19-2004 at 04:57 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by caldjeff on 10-19-2004 at 05:57 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by stuartbennett on 10-19-2004 at 06:46 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by riahc4 on 10-19-2004 at 07:23 PM
RE: RE: Plus! auto detection - by CookieRevised on 10-19-2004 at 10:03 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by Patchou on 10-19-2004 at 11:01 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by aNILEator on 10-19-2004 at 11:19 PM
RE: RE: RE: Plus! auto detection - by caldjeff on 10-20-2004 at 01:16 AM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by CookieRevised on 10-20-2004 at 02:42 AM


Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
View a Printable Version
Send this Thread to a Friend
Subscribe | Add to Favorites
Rate This Thread:

Forum Jump:

Forum Rules:
You cannot post new threads
You cannot post replies
You cannot post attachments
You can edit your posts
HTML is Off
myCode is On
Smilies are On
[img] Code is On