What happened to the Messenger Plus! forums on msghelp.net?
Shoutbox » MsgHelp Archive » Messenger Plus! for Live Messenger » WLM Plus! General » Plus! auto detection

Plus! auto detection
Author: Message:
caldjeff
Junior Member
**

Avatar

Posts: 15
Joined: Oct 2003
RE: RE: RE: Plus! auto detection
quote:
Originally posted by CookieRevised

Also note that the big difference between MSN Messenger, Plus! and plugins is that MSN Messenger is used by everybody. Plus! is not used by everybody, but those who use it espect to use a "safe" non-intrusive application. And although plugins are supported by Plus!, they must be used at the users own risk. If the user chooses to use a intrusive plugin, that's his choice. But that user can't force anybody else to use a certain plugin (eg: oversized emoticons in StuffPlug-NG; both need the plugin for this to work). So there are the three big differences between the three types of programs.


I'm sorry, but I still don't agree with your reasoning here.  It just seems like you're drawing bogus conclusions.  If your "everybody is using it" logic is the determining factor, then why can I write a simple script in php and immediately determine what operating system you are using, what browser and version you are using, the ip address of your computer, what browser plugins you have installed on your machine, and whether or not you have enabled javascript.  Is this a breach of privacy?  Some may think it is, but I happen to think not, along with Microsoft, Apple, Macromedia, Intel and many others.  In my eyes, it is simply a method for finding out more about the users of my applications so I can enhance their web-browsing experience.

quote:
Originally posted by CookieRevised
The only thing that I've said is that this suggestion (auto-checking for Plus! in a hidden way) is a breach of privacy and therefore will not be added. If that is too difficult to believe, and a reason to start a heavy discussion then so be it, but facts stay facts. And this isn't to play the "the all knowing person"; This is me informing people that it is a privacy issue and/or flooding issue and will not be added because of that, just like I said in my first post in this thread.


Again, I think the problem is not that you're trying to be helpful, but the rather demeaning tone and blatant calling of something a "fact" that isn't truly a fact.  Your insight is usually quite helpful.  The "I'm right, you're wrong" attitude is not.
10-20-2004 01:16 AM
Profile E-Mail PM Find Quote Report
« Next Oldest Return to Top Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread
Plus! auto detection - by riahc4 on 10-04-2004 at 06:06 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by Plik on 10-04-2004 at 06:19 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by riahc4 on 10-04-2004 at 06:30 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by Millenium_edition on 10-04-2004 at 06:31 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by riahc4 on 10-04-2004 at 07:03 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by aNILEator on 10-04-2004 at 07:04 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by CookieRevised on 10-05-2004 at 12:38 AM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by aptiva on 10-06-2004 at 12:38 AM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by CookieRevised on 10-06-2004 at 12:55 AM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by riahc4 on 10-12-2004 at 03:35 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by stuartbennett on 10-12-2004 at 09:23 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by gnownoskcid on 10-12-2004 at 11:54 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by patrick on 10-13-2004 at 05:05 AM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by Pyroteq on 10-13-2004 at 06:30 AM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by gnownoskcid on 10-13-2004 at 06:37 AM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by stuartbennett on 10-13-2004 at 06:54 AM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by gnownoskcid on 10-13-2004 at 07:01 AM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by stuartbennett on 10-13-2004 at 07:16 AM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by riahc4 on 10-14-2004 at 03:04 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by matty on 10-14-2004 at 04:20 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by _Humphreys on 10-14-2004 at 06:58 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by riahc4 on 10-14-2004 at 08:20 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by stuartbennett on 10-14-2004 at 09:05 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by CookieRevised on 10-14-2004 at 10:59 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by gnownoskcid on 10-14-2004 at 11:23 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by stuartbennett on 10-15-2004 at 07:46 AM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by riahc4 on 10-18-2004 at 04:06 PM
RE: RE: Plus! auto detection - by CookieRevised on 10-18-2004 at 08:53 PM
RE: RE: RE: Plus! auto detection - by riahc4 on 10-19-2004 at 03:32 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by Millenium_edition on 10-18-2004 at 05:02 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by Millenium_edition on 10-19-2004 at 04:20 PM
RE: RE: RE: RE: Plus! auto detection - by CookieRevised on 10-19-2004 at 04:57 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by caldjeff on 10-19-2004 at 05:57 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by stuartbennett on 10-19-2004 at 06:46 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by riahc4 on 10-19-2004 at 07:23 PM
RE: RE: Plus! auto detection - by CookieRevised on 10-19-2004 at 10:03 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by Patchou on 10-19-2004 at 11:01 PM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by aNILEator on 10-19-2004 at 11:19 PM
RE: RE: RE: Plus! auto detection - by caldjeff on 10-20-2004 at 01:16 AM
RE: Plus! auto detection - by CookieRevised on 10-20-2004 at 02:42 AM


Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
View a Printable Version
Send this Thread to a Friend
Subscribe | Add to Favorites
Rate This Thread:

Forum Jump:

Forum Rules:
You cannot post new threads
You cannot post replies
You cannot post attachments
You can edit your posts
HTML is Off
myCode is On
Smilies are On
[img] Code is On