You've got some other points there, again.
Though, the $group$ variabele was added for my first syntax, where the users could add multiple groups; could be usefull.
After all this useless syntax-sp0m, I'm still not sure which I'm going to use.
![:P](images/smilies/msn_tongue.gif)
My syntax has bugs, so that one already disappears.
However, yours doesn't give enough freedom, imho.
![;)](images/smilies/msn_wink.gif)
It should be possible to give an own way of showing it; your way can only show OR the e-mail, OR the name, not both. And it should be possible to do that for only ONE statement, and different for the other.
After reconsidering all this; maybe the next one is better:
/xwhois group:"groupname","another one","another two" status:brb,busy mask
![:O](images/smilies/msn_surprised.gif)
nline on group $group$: $name$ ($email$) (And maybe more groups or statuses.)
The quotes in the groupname could then just be escaped using the backslash.
The tag would be something like this:
(!XWHOIS_statuses_return value_groupname) (return value being $email$ or $name$ or such.)