What happened to the Messenger Plus! forums on msghelp.net?
Shoutbox » MsgHelp Archive » Messenger Plus! for Live Messenger » WLM Plus! General » better way for checking for Plus!

better way for checking for Plus!
Author: Message:
Unknown...
Junior Member
**


Posts: 63
Joined: Apr 2004
RE: better way for checking for Plus!
Manually checking each and every user, querying if they have plus installed, is really very cumbersome.  Realistically, taking into consideration the way the system works now, if you want to know if someone is using Plus!, you may as well just ask them!  So yes, a better solution is needed.  However there are difficulties to be overcome; technical and privacy.

The technical aren't the main concern, the privacy is.  Personally I sit amongst those who think by installing Plus! you should really be allowing people who satisfy the following:
a) Have Messenger Installed
b) Have plus installed
c) Are accepted on your contact list
d) Are not blocked
...to see you have Plus installed (here comes the critical bit) via a SILENT HANDSHAKE.  It should be presumed that having Plus! installed (amongst all the other conditions listed above) would allow this.  The same underlying core principle is applied to Messenger itself.

This would be beneficial to seeing what features could be activated successfully (I.E. What's the point of sending people formatted text if all they can see is a heap of junk characters?).

However this is only one side of the story, and those who think that a silent handshake model shouldn't be allowed bring up their own set of valid points, much of which I also agree with.

This is a hard issue to place.  A better solution is needed, but (ultimately) compromises will need to be made.

09-24-2005 04:42 PM
Profile E-Mail PM Find Quote Report
« Next Oldest Return to Top Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread
better way for checking for Plus! - by lylesback2 on 09-11-2005 at 05:37 PM
RE: better way for checking for Plus! - by Stigmata on 09-11-2005 at 05:59 PM
RE: better way for checking for Plus! - by Sypher on 09-11-2005 at 07:36 PM
RE: better way for checking for Plus! - by RaceProUK on 09-12-2005 at 12:21 PM
RE: better way for checking for Plus! - by mordero on 09-22-2005 at 04:14 PM
RE: better way for checking for Plus! - by pollolibredegrasa on 09-22-2005 at 06:46 PM
RE: better way for checking for Plus! - by mordero on 09-22-2005 at 07:28 PM
RE: better way for checking for Plus! - by Millenium_edition on 09-22-2005 at 07:41 PM
RE: better way for checking for Plus! - by Unknown... on 09-24-2005 at 04:42 PM
RE: RE: better way for checking for Plus! - by CookieRevised on 09-26-2005 at 11:19 AM
RE: better way for checking for Plus! - by haydos on 09-24-2005 at 05:46 PM
RE: better way for checking for Plus! - by mltz2plz on 09-25-2005 at 03:01 AM
RE: RE: better way for checking for Plus! - by Unknown... on 09-25-2005 at 07:43 AM
RE: better way for checking for Plus! - by haydos on 09-25-2005 at 10:04 AM
RE: better way for checking for Plus! - by Emjaybee on 09-26-2005 at 03:20 AM
RE: better way for checking for Plus! - by evil_panda on 09-26-2005 at 07:41 AM
RE: RE: better way for checking for Plus! - by Unknown... on 09-26-2005 at 09:51 AM
RE: RE: RE: better way for checking for Plus! - by Unknown... on 09-26-2005 at 02:31 PM
RE: better way for checking for Plus! - by CookieRevised on 09-27-2005 at 05:38 AM
RE: better way for checking for Plus! - by elektrixxx on 09-28-2005 at 01:52 AM
RE: RE: better way for checking for Plus! - by Unknown... on 09-28-2005 at 09:06 AM
RE: better way for checking for Plus! - by CookieRevised on 09-28-2005 at 10:38 AM
RE: RE: better way for checking for Plus! - by Unknown... on 09-28-2005 at 07:26 PM


Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
View a Printable Version
Send this Thread to a Friend
Subscribe | Add to Favorites
Rate This Thread:

Forum Jump:

Forum Rules:
You cannot post new threads
You cannot post replies
You cannot post attachments
You can edit your posts
HTML is Off
myCode is On
Smilies are On
[img] Code is On