Shoutbox

--Guido said
"don't let any moderator or developer fool you into thinking that this stuff is fluffy cuddly and nice".

Acording to an English-English dictionary, fool:
idiot, dummy; clown; court jester
which are synonims of stupid.

How's that for fact-checking?
--

Okay, so the pedantic answer to the pedantic answer is .....

Not great since I didn't use 'fool' as a noun.

But that's why its a waste of time persuing threads like this.

A computer engineer reports, under a controlled test, what a lot of other people are telling you, and rather than actually go check it out, .. it's lets get pedantic time.

There was a lot of good information for you to go on, ... mail me personally and I'd identify EXACTLY the registry entries for you that remain ... but no, ....   "it works okay for me so everyone else is wrong" (the blind thing!)

Instead of being constructive though, it's picking at entirely non-relative comment, ignoring the issue at hand and getting nowhere in the process, doing the users (and complainers) no good at all.

How about a slightly more constructive "thanks for reporting the effects, we'll run a similar test on a number of machines and see what happens".

This is DEFINITELY my last comment, .. I supplied you with FACTS, use them or don't, I don't use the plus patch, makes no difference to me.

Best regards

Eds (actually trying to help believe it or not, but banging his head against a brick wall)