Reputation reason guidelines |
Author: |
Message: |
WDZ
Former Admin
![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif)
![Avatar](avatar.php?uid=4-7313)
Posts: 7106 Reputation: 107
– / / ![United States Flag](images/flags/us.png)
Joined: Mar 2002
|
O.P. RE: Reputation reason guidelines
quote: Originally posted by John Anderton
Dz do u think u could put a link on the page where we see the votes we have given to the page where we can see the votes we got
Meh... I guess so... I'll just put it down at the bottom because I don't see a better-looking place for it.
quote: Originally posted by John Anderton
Does that include old unupdated votes cause i have votes from december and january.
Well, my guidelines don't say anything about the age of votes... ![:-/](images/smilies/xso_undecided.gif)
|
|
04-15-2005 12:23 PM |
|
![](images/pixel.gif) |
John Anderton
Elite Member
![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif)
![Avatar](avatar.php?uid=40401-16370)
Posts: 3908 Reputation: 80
37 / / ![India Flag](images/flags/in.png)
Joined: Nov 2004
Status: Away
|
RE: Reputation reason guidelines
quote: Originally posted by WDZ
Meh... I guess so... I'll just put it down at the bottom because I don't see a better-looking place for it.
Thats what i was wishing for ![:)](images/smilies/msn_happy.gif)
Just where the link to 'votes given' is
quote: Originally posted by WDZ
Well, my guidelines don't say anything about the age of votes...
![:undecided:](images/smilies/xso_undecided.gif) Ok ..... u could include that ..... Just kidding ![:P](images/smilies/msn_tongue.gif)
[
KarunAB.com]
[img]http://gamercards.exophase.com/459422.png[
/img]
|
|
04-15-2005 02:16 PM |
|
![](images/pixel.gif) |
Sam Spade
Junior Member
![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif)
<Insert inspirational comment here>
Posts: 64 Reputation: -9
58 / – / –
Joined: Sep 2004
|
RE: Reputation reason guidelines
quote: Originally posted by WDZ
The following guidelines apply to reputation vote reasons and determine whether they are "not good" (invalid).
Finally, sanity is *beginning* to prevail.
|
|
04-15-2005 02:44 PM |
|
![](images/pixel.gif) |
WDZ
Former Admin
![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif)
![Avatar](avatar.php?uid=4-7313)
Posts: 7106 Reputation: 107
– / / ![United States Flag](images/flags/us.png)
Joined: Mar 2002
|
O.P. RE: Reputation reason guidelines
quote: Originally posted by WDZ
Well, I already have something like that, but the number is 5. Perhaps I should bump it up to 15... ![:dodgy:](images/smilies/dodgy.gif)
Update: the number is now 15, and I increased the required number of spaces to 2.
I've been seeing WAY too many reasons that just say "good member" or "nice member." Those are basically meaningless, IMO.
|
|
04-22-2005 06:48 PM |
|
![](images/pixel.gif) |
Lou
Veteran Member
![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif)
![Avatar](http://dotlou.com/stuff/avs/1.png)
Posts: 2475 Reputation: 43
– / / ![Canada Flag](images/flags/ca.png)
Joined: Aug 2004
|
RE: Reputation reason guidelines
The future holds bright things in it\\\'s path, but only time will tell what they are and where they come from.
Messenger Stuff Forums
|
|
09-06-2005 12:42 AM |
|
![](images/pixel.gif) |
RebelSean
Veteran Member
![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif)
![Avatar](images/avatars/supertux.gif)
Microsoft Evangelist
Posts: 2602 Reputation: 59
33 / / ![United States Flag](images/flags/us.png)
Joined: May 2004
Status: Away
|
RE: Reputation reason guidelines
Na it's not, it was by a former member (can't remember who) whos account was deleted. I think I even have that on my reps too.
|
|
09-06-2005 12:49 AM |
|
![](images/pixel.gif) |
dylan!
Senior Member
![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif)
![Avatar](avatar.php?uid=43150-4155)
l33t p4int3r
Posts: 665 Reputation: 30
– / / ![Montserrat Flag](images/flags/ms.png)
Joined: Jan 2005
|
RE: Reputation reason guidelines
you could find out anyways...lets pretend i gave you a dodgy rep and you wanted to know if i only did that to u or if i always do it so i click it and it makes things easier...but without that we could still find out by looking at a bunch of peoples reps and looking at the ones i gave them to see if their dodgy or not your just making things easier ![:P](images/smilies/msn_tongue.gif)
its just like saying that i have 1 rep and yyou can only see the rep that you gave me so you dont invade other peoples provacy by being able to see what they gave me
This post was edited on 09-06-2005 at 01:02 AM by dylan!.
|
|
09-06-2005 01:00 AM |
|
![](images/pixel.gif) |
Hank
Banned
Posts: 3129 Reputation: 5
– / – / ![Australia Flag](images/flags/au.png)
Joined: Nov 2003
Status: Away
|
RE: Reputation reason guidelines
quote: Originally posted by WDZ
I moved these to a separate thread so they're easier to find and refer to.
The following guidelines apply to reputation vote reasons and determine whether they are "not good" (invalid).
- No comment at all (blank, or something like "no comment").
- The comment doesn't make any sense, or is some "internal" joke between two members.
- The comment is completely random like "I like puppies" or "woot" and has nothing to do with the member.
- The comment is some type of greeting like "hey, I'm voting for you" or "woot, Test_User!".
- It's based purely on the gender of the member.
- It's really short, like "wtf" or just some emoticons.
- It relies on previously posted comments ("what they said" or "/me quotes Test_User").
- It's purely insulting/bashing, or "ganging up" on a member, or part of an attempt to reach a certain number (goal).
- An Admin knows for a fact that the comment is untrue.
This list is not necessarily complete, and is subject to change. ![:)](images/smilies/msn_happy.gif)
i still think the reputation system on this Board should be abolished . they really serve no Purpose, an there Sexist, ,
This post was edited on 04-21-2006 at 10:36 AM by Hank.
|
|
09-06-2005 01:12 AM |
|
![](images/pixel.gif) |
qgroessl
Veteran Member
![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif) ![*](images/star.gif)
Posts: 1615 Reputation: 22
33 / – / ![United States Flag](images/flags/us.png)
Joined: Jul 2005
Status: Away
|
RE: Reputation reason guidelines
quote: Originally posted by Animal
i still think the reputation system on these Boarrds should be abolished . they really serve no Purpose, an there Sexist, ,
Well... there was waaay too much demand for it to abolish it..... AND! there was way too much time and work put into it..... I wasn't here when it started... But I've gotten that from other posts/threads/etc.
|
|
09-06-2005 01:14 AM |
|
![](images/pixel.gif) |
Hank
Banned
Posts: 3129 Reputation: 5
– / – / ![Australia Flag](images/flags/au.png)
Joined: Nov 2003
Status: Away
|
RE: Reputation reason guidelines
i mean, there just like the World Golf Rankings, just because Tiger Woods is Number 1 on them, doesnt mean there's no other Good Golfer that can beat him. so i look at it this way. everyone on these boards generally does a Good Job at Helping.
|
|
09-06-2005 01:19 AM |
|
![](images/pixel.gif) |
Pages: (8):
« First
«
1
2
3
4
[ 5 ]
6
7
8
»
Last »
|
|