What happened to the Messenger Plus! forums on msghelp.net?
Shoutbox » MsgHelp Archive » Skype & Technology » Tech Talk » Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia,

Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia,
Author: Message:
Menthix
forum admin
*******

Avatar

Posts: 5537
Reputation: 102
39 / Male / Flag
Joined: Mar 2002
RE: Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia,
quote:
Originally posted by Discrate
P.S Remember, there is two filters, one for everyone (blocks out illegal sites such as child porn) and then theres a filter for families with kids, which is optional.
Both fail.

Like I said before, child porn shouldn't be blocked and act like nothing happened. Put the money in effort which would go to the filter into actually putting the people creating and distributing this in jail.

As for the "optional" filter: Make it opt-in instead of opt-out and have a legal guarantee it can never be forced on people in any way.


quote:
Originally posted by Discrate
There are two lists,
1: a 'child' safe list which filters both illegal content and hardcore pornography
2: a second which users can 'opt-out' to which only filters unwanted content.
So "llegal content and hardcore pornography" is mandatory blocked. They even made the distinction between illegal content and hardcore pornography. Meaning even as an adult without children in the house you can say goodbye to your porn, no opt-out about it.

quote:
Originally posted by Discrate
* Other political parties and members have made their intentions clear to include further content to be banned, such as overseas online gambling, and as suggested by Family First Senator Steve Fielding - hardcore pornography.
          o 'Conservative' Senator, Cory Bernadi has since rescinded his support for the Government's plan, voiced his concerns with mandatory Internet filtering, and has also elaborated no his frustations with the current filtering systems in use in Parliamentary offices. 1

    * Email, Peer to Peer, Instant messaging, newsgroups and any other custom application protocols are on the ACMA report as things that the Government is also planning to apply the ISP-Level filtering to.

    * Conroy has answered in the Senate at Question Time that the filtering system will block access to "unwanted content". He has avoided answering any questions that Senator Ludlam has directed at him.
Welcome to China.

quote:
Originally posted by Discrate
It became known that the ACMA blacklist contains political content when a member of Whirlpool recently submitted a complaint relating to an anti-abortion website which contained pictures of unborn fetuses (however legal) to ACMA. ACMA confirmed that they were satisified that the images were something that would be classified as RC by the classification board and that the website had been added to the blacklist.
Holy shit.


That's much worse than I thought it already was. Fight against any kind of filtering, and if either of the filters makes it through... proxy for life or consider moving to another country.

This post was edited on 09-23-2009 at 01:50 PM by Menthix.
Finish the problem
Menthix.net | Contact Me
09-23-2009 01:45 PM
Profile E-Mail PM Web Find Quote Report
« Next Oldest Return to Top Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread
Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia, - by Jarrod on 09-23-2009 at 12:49 AM
RE: Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia, - by toddy on 09-23-2009 at 01:33 AM
RE: Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia, - by Jarrod on 09-23-2009 at 02:07 AM
RE: Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia, - by Menthix on 09-23-2009 at 10:04 AM
RE: Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia, - by Th3rmal on 09-23-2009 at 10:37 AM
RE: Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia, - by Jarrod on 09-23-2009 at 10:58 AM
RE: Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia, - by Menthix on 09-23-2009 at 11:35 AM
RE: RE: Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia, - by Phillip on 09-23-2009 at 11:45 AM
RE: Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia, - by vaccination on 09-23-2009 at 11:49 AM
RE: Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia, - by Th3rmal on 09-23-2009 at 12:21 PM
RE: Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia, - by Volv on 09-23-2009 at 12:24 PM
RE: Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia, - by Discrate on 09-23-2009 at 01:08 PM
RE: Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia, - by Menthix on 09-23-2009 at 01:45 PM
RE: Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia, - by Th3rmal on 09-23-2009 at 02:07 PM
RE: Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia, - by Menthix on 09-23-2009 at 02:13 PM
RE: Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia, - by Th3rmal on 09-23-2009 at 02:16 PM
RE: Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia, - by andrey on 09-23-2009 at 02:21 PM
RE: Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia, - by Volv on 09-23-2009 at 02:29 PM
RE: Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia, - by Discrate on 09-24-2009 at 12:38 AM
RE: Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia, - by Chrono on 09-24-2009 at 01:01 AM
RE: RE: Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia, - by Hank on 09-24-2009 at 01:07 AM
RE: RE: Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia, - by Discrate on 09-24-2009 at 01:29 AM
RE: Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia, - by ShawnZ on 09-24-2009 at 05:17 AM
RE: Response to the nationwide internet filter in Australia, - by -dt- on 09-24-2009 at 06:14 AM


Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
View a Printable Version
Send this Thread to a Friend
Subscribe | Add to Favorites
Rate This Thread:

Forum Jump:

Forum Rules:
You cannot post new threads
You cannot post replies
You cannot post attachments
You can edit your posts
HTML is Off
myCode is On
Smilies are On
[img] Code is On