| Search Results |
| Subject |
Author |
Forum |
Time |
RE: compare MP3's
It's time to be picky again! :banana: MP3 is based on MPEG Audio Layer 3 encoding - that is, MPEG1, not to be mixed with later revisions of the MPEG standard. As far as I know, MPEG3 was aborted and never used in the big world... So there's just MP... | sock | Tech Talk | 04-06-2004 at 02:55 AM |
RE: Audio extraction without recompressing?
Blah, you replied while I was editing my post a bit... :p /me won't comment on the first replies (to avoid :argue:). :p Oh... I know I can do that. :p But I want the original compression so I could have a small file size + same quality + no redundan... | sock | Tech Talk | 04-06-2004 at 02:34 AM |
RE: Audio extraction without recompressing?
I can't keep the same bitrate when moving from MP3 to PCM without losing quality, as PCM has no compression. The audio in MP3 is decompressed before it can be played by the computer, so in fact every song can be represented at 1440 [noparse](?)[/nop... | sock | Tech Talk | 04-06-2004 at 01:53 AM |
RE: Audio extraction without recompressing?
Blah.... :p Any audiophile will tell you that recompressing data that's been compressed using a lossy codec is a bad idea. The quality will always degrade somewhat (depending on how you recompress the data and how it was compressed before). But even... | sock | Tech Talk | 04-04-2004 at 11:03 PM |
RE: Audio extraction without recompressing?
Thanks 'FD:), but I'm afraid that's no good.... That program does two things: - Decompresses (decodes) the audio stream from the WMV file using a WMA codec, which produces a Wave file; - Compresses (encodes) the raw audio stream using a codec and ... | sock | Tech Talk | 04-04-2004 at 07:48 PM |
Audio extraction without recompressing?
[size=1](Also posted on the [url=http://forums.winamp.com/showthread.php?threa did=175260]Winamp.com Forums[/url])[/size] Hello! :) Umm... does anyone know of a way to extract the audio stream out of a WMV file, [color=red][b]without recompressing[/b]... | sock | Tech Talk | 04-04-2004 at 04:11 AM |
RE: Messenger Plus! 3 - Now Beta
Yes, but in my opinion, a public release candidate (which, as far as Patchou and the testers concern, is bug-free) would be a good idea, because then thousands of Plus!-fanatics could test it and make sure it's really bug free, on all strange system... | sock | Archive | 04-03-2004 at 08:14 PM |
RE: Messenger Plus! 3 - Now Beta
I think a public beta/RC phase would be a good idea, but there's a lot of time before that (private beta phase + translation phase), so you'll have to wait a while... :p Patchou, congratulations for releasing the beta version, you've done a great ... | sock | Archive | 03-29-2004 at 06:26 PM |
RE: Patchou's Webcam (Image Inside)
LOL, nice shot Matty! :) Nah... Don't be so hard on yourself, it's a nice picture. :p You look much better than in "Patate Spears". :gfdrin: | sock | General Chit Chat | 03-23-2004 at 11:18 AM |
RE: Messenger Plus! 3 Progress
Choli: I wasn't talking about an auto msg saying "I can't auto-accept any more files" (which, by the way, would be redundant IMO), I was talking about the message that Windows/MSN Messenger [b]itself[/b] shows to you (user B) when you can't rece... | sock | Archive | 03-22-2004 at 11:33 PM |
RE: Messenger Plus! 3 Progress
If the error is only written in the conversation window, I see no reason to have Plus! do the limiting itself. Being flooded with that kind of messages is exactly the same as being flooded with normal messages from a contact. It can happen to anyone,... | sock | Archive | 03-22-2004 at 07:03 PM |
RE: Messenger Plus! 3 Progress
[b]Edit:[/b] Blah, Hoof beat me to it.... :p Well, I still made another point so I won't delete this post. @Choli: No, the person who sends can't be flooded as he's the one who's sending the files. The other person, however, can be flooded with f... | sock | Archive | 03-21-2004 at 07:52 PM |
RE: IRC (chat) Details
[size=4][b]Tips for mIRC users[/b][/size] [size=3][b]1. Easy-join alias[/b][/size] mIRC can store a list of aliases, which are similar to Quick Texts in Messenger Plus!. This way, you can create a short alias to easily join the Plus! chat in the futu... | sock | Forum & Website | 03-21-2004 at 10:03 AM |
RE: Hosting website on... my own computer?
You can check your IP address each time you reconnect to see if it changes or not. [url]http://shoutbox.menthix.net/ip.php[/url] What kind of Internet connection do you have? It might not be a good idea to host a site on your PC if it has a slow upst... | sock | Tech Talk | 03-19-2004 at 02:24 PM |
RE: Messenger Plus! 3 Progress
By "setup switch", do you mean the feature I requested (:gfdrin:)? (That is, being able to install Plus! for a specific user only, even when you have admin rights.) | sock | Archive | 03-18-2004 at 11:53 AM |
RE: where did "location" go?
Central Israel = 14 chars :banana: I think it's not a bad idea. :p I also think that small flags would look nice. :p | sock | Forum & Website | 03-17-2004 at 06:24 AM |
RE: MSN Plus! 3
I think he meant you should make such a thing for the beta testers too.... :-/ Anyway, I personally don't care much about these improvements, as there's only one other person who helps me translate (he reviews my translation and suggests improvemen... | sock | Translation | 03-17-2004 at 05:51 AM |
RE: Messenger Plus! 3 Progress
Had to split it into two parts because of the smiley limit. :blah: I'd say this is a good idea, but the /ping thingie isn't 100% reliable when checking if the contact has Plus! or not (they could disable the PING feature, there could be network pro... | sock | Archive | 03-17-2004 at 05:40 AM |
RE: Messenger Plus! 3 Progress
[b]Mega-post from sock!![/b] :banana: By "setup switch" you mean being able to install Plus! for a specific user only? (as I requested:gfdrin:) If so, :banana:. BTW, will the new Plus! menu exist in MSN Messenger 5.0 and Windows Messenger? Just bei... | sock | Archive | 03-17-2004 at 05:38 AM |
RE: Messenger Plus! 3 Progress
This sure is exciting news... :) Can't wait to see it in action! :) :banana: Good luck with the code and design, Patchou and GFD. :) (Y) BTW, are you going to wait for MSN Messenger 6.2 (April 22 I believe) before releasing MP3? BTW2, if you already... | sock | Archive | 03-16-2004 at 11:12 AM |
RE: Niouzes
Patch, I'm sorry that the server issue had to take away so much of your time.... I hope the server is more fortunate with the new OS! :banana: Anyway, good luck with the new Plus!, we're all very excited about it! (Y) I'm happy to be your Hebrew t... | sock | General Chit Chat | 03-14-2004 at 01:36 AM |
RE: you can report bugs now
In Johnny's screenshot, the "General" category starts with a white background while the three other categories start with a grey background... :-/ | sock | Forum & Website | 03-13-2004 at 05:29 AM |
RE: IRC!
Umm, you can't link together different IRCD types... :rolleyes: Anyhoo.... :banana: @ Cookish's support for EFnet's features. And :shocked: @ DX's long post... You should hit "Enter" more often. :p /me is feeling great in his nice little #msgpl... | sock | | 03-08-2004 at 08:32 PM |
RE: IRC!
I enjoyed running the server, but when it's a target for attacks it's just not fun anymore. I'm tired of this crap. I love IRCnet/EFnet, the original IRC networks (they were one network since the late 1980's when IRC was born, and split in 1994).... | sock | | 03-05-2004 at 07:49 PM |
RE: Netscape = illness?
:-o I love you man. | sock | Tech Talk | 02-29-2004 at 03:15 AM |