| For goodness sake, extend the signature length! |
| Author: |
Message: |
Hank
Banned
Posts: 3129
Reputation: 5
– / – / 
Joined: Nov 2003
Status: Away
|
|
RE: For goodness sake, extend the signature length!
if anything Signature Lengths should be shortened IMO
|
|
| 04-17-2007 09:36 AM |
|
 |
Lou
Veteran Member
Posts: 2475
Reputation: 43
– /  / 
Joined: Aug 2004
|
RE: For goodness sake, extend the signature length!
quote:
Originally posted by ICQ
if anything Signature Lengths should be shortened IMO
Why? ![[Image: msghelp.net.png]](http://dotlou.com/stuff/sigs/msghelp.net.png)
The future holds bright things in it\\\'s path, but only time will tell what they are and where they come from.
Messenger Stuff Forums |
|
| 04-17-2007 11:00 AM |
|
|
Oxy
Veteran Member
Posts: 1368
Reputation: 24
30 / / 
Joined: Jul 2006
|
RE: For goodness sake, extend the signature length!
quote:
Originally posted by .Lou
quote:
Originally posted by ICQ
if anything Signature Lengths should be shortened IMO
Why?
I don't see why either.. I mean, more text really isn't much.. it's the images you've gotta watch out for.. |
|
| 04-17-2007 11:23 AM |
|
|
vaccination
Veteran Member
Posts: 2513
Reputation: 43
32 / / –
Joined: Apr 2005
|
|
RE: For goodness sake, extend the signature length!
Seeing as there's already a image limit(3 or something?) then extending the amount of characters wouldn't be a problem, cause there's no problem in downloading more text. And with the fixed amount of space for signatures already in place there wont be any increase in the length of sigs so I can't see the harm.
So either extend character limit or, like previously said, don't count tags or urls
|
|
| 04-17-2007 11:52 AM |
|
|
Oxy
Veteran Member
Posts: 1368
Reputation: 24
30 / /
Joined: Jul 2006
|
RE: For goodness sake, extend the signature length!
is anything going to be done with the sig? 
This post was edited on 04-18-2007 at 10:37 AM by Tochjo.
|
|
| 04-18-2007 10:07 AM |
|
|
Lou
Veteran Member
Posts: 2475
Reputation: 43
– / /
Joined: Aug 2004
|
RE: For goodness sake, extend the signature length!
quote:
Originally posted by .Lou
quote:
Originally posted by ICQ
if anything Signature Lengths should be shortened IMO
Why?
I must ask again. See if you can't give a good reason for them to be shortened, it's the same as everyone else not giving a good reason for them to be lengthened. No reason = no change.
This post was edited on 04-18-2007 at 10:37 AM by Tochjo.
The future holds bright things in it\\\'s path, but only time will tell what they are and where they come from.
Messenger Stuff Forums |
|
| 04-18-2007 10:35 AM |
|
|
WDZ
Former Admin
Posts: 7106
Reputation: 107
– / / 
Joined: Mar 2002
|
RE: RE: For goodness sake, extend the signature length!
quote:
Originally posted by Lukas
is anything going to be done with the sig?
Yes.  Like I said above, I think excluding the length of URLs is a good idea, and in fact, I already implemented it yesterday.
The character limit is still 400, but URLs now count as only one character each. Also, I disabled the dodgy old Javascript-based limiter.
This post was edited on 04-19-2007 at 01:01 AM by WDZ.
|
|
| 04-19-2007 12:56 AM |
|
|
Rolando
Veteran Member
Santasend
Posts: 1325
Reputation: 52
33 / /
Joined: Feb 2006
|
RE: For goodness sake, extend the signature length!
quote:
Originally posted by WDZ
quote:
Originally posted by Lukas
is anything going to be done with the sig?
Yes. Like I said above, I think excluding the length of URLs is a good idea, and in fact, I already implemented it yesterday.
The character limit is still 400, but URLs now count as only one character each. Also, I disabled the dodgy old Javascript-based limiter.
 |
|
| 04-19-2007 12:59 AM |
|
|
Hank
Banned
Posts: 3129
Reputation: 5
– / – /
Joined: Nov 2003
Status: Away
|
RE: RE: For goodness sake, extend the signature length!
quote:
Originally posted by .Lou
quote:
Originally posted by ICQ
if anything Signature Lengths should be shortened IMO
Why?
some are to Big, , + with people still on Dialiup it'd be quicker for those to download the page/thread .. not all of us Users are on Broadband
quote:
Originally posted by Lukas
it's the images you've gotta watch out for.
thats my point im trying to make,, the IMages people use,, text anyone can download that fast
This post was edited on 04-19-2007 at 01:56 AM by Hank.
|
|
| 04-19-2007 01:53 AM |
|
|
prashker
Veteran Member
Posts: 5109
Reputation: 104
– / / –
Joined: Mar 2005
Status: Away
|
RE: For goodness sake, extend the signature length!
quote:
Originally posted by WDZ
quote:
Originally posted by Lukas
is anything going to be done with the sig?
Yes. Like I said above, I think excluding the length of URLs is a good idea, and in fact, I already implemented it yesterday.
The character limit is still 400, but URLs now count as only one character each. Also, I disabled the dodgy old Javascript-based limiter.
niiiiiiiiice  .
quote:
Originally posted by ICQ
some are to Big, , + with people still on Dialiup it'd be quicker for those to download the page/thread .. not all of us Users are on Broadband
Thats what this is for
![[Image: attachment.php?pid=810046]](http://shoutbox.menthix.net/attachment.php?pid=810046)
tbh, WDZ. Add to the registration form of the website, "Do you have dialup" Which then disables the 2 things in that picture automatically when you signup  .
 Attachment: Untitled.jpg (21.7 KB)
This file has been downloaded 268 time(s).
This post was edited on 04-19-2007 at 02:02 AM by prashker.
|
|
| 04-19-2007 01:59 AM |
|
|
|
Pages: (4):
« First
«
1
2
3
[ 4 ]
Last »
|
|
|
![[Image: dotlukas.gif]](http://bar.tweetbars.com/dotlukas.gif)
![[Image: jumbled.png]](http://img202.imageshack.us/img202/7070/jumbled.png)
![[Image: sigxmascopy.png]](http://img200.imageshack.us/img200/3262/sigxmascopy.png)