What happened to the Messenger Plus! forums on msghelp.net?
Shoutbox » MsgHelp Archive » Skype & Technology » Skype & Live Messenger » MSN Messenger 7.5.0311 Poly?? NE1?

MSN Messenger 7.5.0311 Poly?? NE1?
Author: Message:
Soul_Reaver
New Member
*


Posts: 2
Joined: Nov 2005
O.P. Huh?  MSN Messenger 7.5.0311 Poly?? NE1?
Has anyone found a polygammy patch for MSN Messenger 7.5.0311 yet?  I've always liked MSN Ghost by Volv, but they haven't released one yet.  Everyone seems to be dragging their feet.
???

This post was edited on 11-20-2005 at 04:05 PM by Soul_Reaver.
11-20-2005 04:05 PM
Profile E-Mail PM Find Quote Report
Max
Full Member
***

Avatar

Posts: 460
Reputation: 17
34 / Male / –
Joined: Mar 2005
RE: MSN Messenger 7.5.0311 Poly?? NE1?
Download Mess Patch from Mess.be or A-Patch from A-Patch, or to make it legal - StuffPlug - NG but StuffPlug requires Messenger Plus!

11-20-2005 04:09 PM
Profile PM Find Quote Report
Zahid™
Senior Member
****

Avatar

Posts: 954
Reputation: 18
– / Male / Flag
Joined: Nov 2005
RE: MSN Messenger 7.5.0311 Poly?? NE1?
[Mess Patch] [A-Patch]
[Image: Zahid.png]
11-20-2005 05:29 PM
Profile PM Web Find Quote Report
absorbation
Elite Member
*****

Avatar

Posts: 3636
Reputation: 81
– / Male / Flag
Joined: Feb 2005
RE: MSN Messenger 7.5.0311 Poly?? NE1?
quote:
Originally posted by Patches
or to make it legal

1.) it's against terms of use
2.) stuffplug is not totally legal infact as cookie said "patchs would be black and programs would be grey"

There are many things that enable polygramy if you want something just for polygramy then i suggest multi msn by the boss:

http://www.msgshit.com/downloads/521

This post was edited on 11-20-2005 at 06:17 PM by absorbation.
11-20-2005 06:09 PM
Profile PM Find Quote Report
Max
Full Member
***

Avatar

Posts: 460
Reputation: 17
34 / Male / –
Joined: Mar 2005
RE: MSN Messenger 7.5.0311 Poly?? NE1?
I thought StuffPlug uses alot of advanced coding, instead of patching?
11-20-2005 07:24 PM
Profile PM Find Quote Report
ShawnZ
Veteran Member
*****

Avatar

Posts: 3146
Reputation: 43
32 / Male / Flag
Joined: Jan 2003
RE: MSN Messenger 7.5.0311 Poly?? NE1?
quote:
Originally posted by Absorbation
2.) stuffplug is not totally legal infact as
cookiesaid "patchs would be black and programs would be
grey"
stuffplug is totally legal...
Spoiler:
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
the game.
11-20-2005 08:19 PM
Profile PM Web Find Quote Report
Soul_Reaver
New Member
*


Posts: 2
Joined: Nov 2005
O.P. RE: MSN Messenger 7.5.0311 Poly?? NE1?
Thanks Patches... I checked the one on Mess.be, but it didn't say it would work for this build... but the one from Apatch did!
:grin::grin::grin::grin:
11-20-2005 11:34 PM
Profile E-Mail PM Find Quote Report
CookieRevised
Elite Member
*****

Avatar

Posts: 15517
Reputation: 173
– / Male / Flag
Joined: Jul 2003
Status: Away
RE: RE: MSN Messenger 7.5.0311 Poly?? NE1?
[OFF TOPIC]

quote:
Originally posted by Absorbation
2.) stuffplug is not totally legal infact as cookie said "patchs would be black and programs would be grey"
Errrmmm... hehehe... almost :p

"If a normal legal program is white and hard patches (illegal) are black, than soft patching (patching in memory) is grey..."

quote:
Originally posted by Patches
I thought StuffPlug uses alot of advanced coding, instead of patching?
both... It also 'simply' patches a lot of stuff. In fact many things of what people call "advanced coding" is nothing more than soft patching.

-and with that I don't mean that stuffplug is nothing advanced at all
-also the trick is to know what and how to patch of course

quote:
Originally posted by .Fusion
AFAIK, it patches in the virtual memory or something...?
Please correct me if im wrong, im not a programmer but i swear i heard that somewhere....
Some stuff of what StuffPlug does involves patching the program file in memory (as apposed to patching the program file itself on disc)

quote:
Originally posted by ShawnZ
stuffplug is totally legal...
No it is not!!! Patching in ANY way is still technically as illegal as robbing a bank. Patching in memory is only "a bit less illegal" than patching a program file on disc. StuffPlug is certainly not "totally legal".

[/OFF TOPIC]

This post was edited on 11-21-2005 at 01:09 AM by CookieRevised.
.-= A 'frrrrrrrituurrr' for Wacky =-.
11-21-2005 01:07 AM
Profile PM Find Quote Report
GiantSpider
Veteran Member
*****

Avatar

Posts: 1435
Reputation: 21
34 / Male / Flag
Joined: Sep 2003
RE: MSN Messenger 7.5.0311 Poly?? NE1?
I thought it was loaders that were "grey" & that "soft" patching & "hard" patching were each as bad as each other.
11-28-2005 10:42 PM
Profile PM Find Quote Report
CookieRevised
Elite Member
*****

Avatar

Posts: 15517
Reputation: 173
– / Male / Flag
Joined: Jul 2003
Status: Away
RE: MSN Messenger 7.5.0311 Poly?? NE1?
hmm, true... the comparisson with robbing a bank was exaggerated (and technically -in context of law- not correct). But I needed something strong to get the point across :p

When most people speak in these contexts of altering MSN Messenger (in any way) and the word "illegal" is used, I almost am certain they all mean 'illegal' as in breaking the contract which you accepted when you use the program.

In terms of law and all, this word "illegal" is indeed not the same and it is debatable in court, as "illegal" is a word used in reference to law, and it is not a law you're braking but a contract between you and the program maker.

But this said (and thus, I fully agree with you on this matter), I bet that now people are going to say and understand all this as patching is very legal to do (people simply think that way and/or take it that way), ... hence my use of a strong comparisson and not so technically correct (in every detail) description. (the end/result justifies the means).


------

quote:
Originally posted by tehGspider
I thought it was loaders that were "grey" & that "soft" patching & "hard" patching were each as bad as each other.
A loader almost always loads a program and then patches some stuff in memory (so the program runs, so the game score is froozen, so you can cheat, etc... ) aka the exact definition of a "soft" patch.

This post was edited on 11-29-2005 at 12:11 AM by CookieRevised.
.-= A 'frrrrrrrituurrr' for Wacky =-.
11-29-2005 12:09 AM
Profile PM Find Quote Report
« Next Oldest Return to Top Next Newest »


Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
View a Printable Version
Send this Thread to a Friend
Subscribe | Add to Favorites
Rate This Thread:

Forum Jump:

Forum Rules:
You cannot post new threads
You cannot post replies
You cannot post attachments
You can edit your posts
HTML is Off
myCode is On
Smilies are On
[img] Code is On