Shoutbox

Well, what are your thoughts?

Did she intentionally smuggle drugs into bali? or were they put into her bag by someone else

Please, respect other peoples opinions, and don't flame anyone else for having a different opinion than your own

I doubt anybody could've gotten close enough to put the drugs in her bag, if they wanted to smuggle drugs, they would've got a trusted and more professional source, rather than risk losing the drugs.

quote:

---

Originally posted by traxor
I doubt anybody could've gotten close enough to put the drugs in her bag, if they wanted to smuggle drugs, they would've got a trusted and more professional source, rather than risk losing the drugs.

---

I absolotely Agree!

quote:

---

Originally posted by traxor
I doubt anybody could've gotten close enough to put the drugs in her bag

---

Baggage handlers?

You never know who might be around

quote:

---

Originally posted by traxor
if they wanted to smuggle drugs, they would've got a trusted and more professional source, rather than risk losing the drugs.

---

Very true...but this isn't the first people have tryed to smuggle drugs this way (putting drugs in another persons luggage bag)

On balance of probabilities i would say she was innocent.

She definately wouldnt have being convicted if she was on trial under Australian law....


Btw people outside Oz actually know about corby?!

lol okay gimme a cliffnotes version of who she is

quote:

---

Originally posted by -rafy-
She definately wouldnt have being convicted if she was on trial under Australian law....

---

The Australian experts who were up in Bali watching the trials say she would have been convicted

She wouldn't have gotten as big of a punishment as she got in Bali, but they say she would still have been found guilty

But then again, Bali is different to Australia...

quote:

---

A reasonable doubt is a doubt based upon reason and common sense, and not the mere possibility of innocence. A reasonable doubt is the kind of doubt that would make a reasonable person hesitate to act. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt, therefore, must be proof of such a convincing character that a reasonable person would not hesitate to rely and act upon it. However, proof beyond a reasonable doubt does not mean proof beyond all possible doubt.

---

I think that could have been a huge factor if she was trialed here in Australia

Australia - Innocent until proven guilty
Bali - Guilty until proven innocent

The media hypes stuff up to much these days get over it.

She is definately innocent. I can't see any reasons why she would be guilty.

Unlike the Bali 9, they're fucked. They were stupid enough to strap the stuff to their bodies. Idiots (I feel ashamed that one of them use to go to my school!). But I feel sorry for them in a wierd way.

Anyway, back to Corby... She's innocent!!! I can't understand why the judge would send her to jail for 20 years while the guy who planned the Bali bombings, got 2 years!!!!!

Would somebody please point me in the direction of an article in relation to this case, I would like to read through it and check out stuff.