[OFF TOPIC]
quote:
Originally posted by Absorbation
2.) stuffplug is not totally legal infact as cookie said "patchs would be black and programs would be grey"
Errrmmm... hehehe... almost
"If a normal legal program is white and hard patches (illegal) are black, than soft patching (patching in memory) is grey..."
quote:
Originally posted by Patches
I thought StuffPlug uses alot of advanced coding, instead of patching?
both... It also 'simply' patches a lot of stuff. In fact many things of what people call "advanced coding" is nothing more than soft patching.
-and with that I don't mean that stuffplug is nothing advanced at all
-also the trick is to know what and how to patch of course
quote:
Originally posted by .Fusion
AFAIK, it patches in the virtual memory or something...?
Please correct me if im wrong, im not a programmer but i swear i heard that somewhere....
Some stuff of what StuffPlug does involves patching the program file in memory (as apposed to patching the program file itself on disc)
quote:
Originally posted by ShawnZ
stuffplug is totally legal...
No it is not!!! Patching in ANY way is still technically as illegal as robbing a bank. Patching in memory is only "a bit less illegal" than patching a program file on disc. StuffPlug is certainly not "totally legal".
[/OFF TOPIC]
/ 
