Yep, I agree with LEE123.
Especially when she says Microsoft managed the thing in a poor way. Honestly, Microsoft can be a great enterprise, but they make some huge mistakes sometimes that leaves me wondering wether there's a genious or a retard managing it.
Giving you an award and then leaving you without it, I think that lacks of moral. Besides, it's irresponsable. They cannot just do that, they look like a child who made a mistake and doesn't care about the consequences, they give you the award and suddenly they take it from you for free.
I'm sure Patchou is not really going to show Microsoft his deep feelings but I can be pretty sure this kind of attitude from Microsoft hurt him.
It makes me believe that Microsoft reacts/responds to the "community" and to the critics, perhaps Patchou should answer that the same way, according to THIS community
All the way back, LEE123 is "sort of right". Giving an award to someone that "indirectly pushes" (according to critics, or not) spyware to your computer is some kind of mistreating for the novice users who just clicked "YES"/"I ACCEPT" when installing MP. I still hear from people and friends who don't really like to instal MP because of the dissasters that the sponsor did after they install MP, but the thing is that most of them are not even AWARE of the fact that they chose to install the sponsor at all. So here comes the stupid aspect of all this. Clicking NEXT until a software is installed WITHOUT reading anything that appears on the screen is just as irresponsable as giving an award and then taking it out, AS MUCH AS giving an award and then taking into account what the community says about it. I mean, it seems Microsoft sometimes can lack of conviction. And this fact probes it clearly.
I insist, what should especialists and the community say about Microsoft disabling antispyware modules from its operating system just because they cannot stop piracy.
Think about it.
