quote:
Originally posted by vaccination
Well you got me there
i win
inside and outside would work, but...what if you were in a war, and were shot in the arm and the bullet is still there - is the case with many older people - then you would never be allowd to fly. because you'd have to prove that its a bullet and not a bomb...how would you do that? cut open the skarred wound?
it will soon become a point when travelling will become nearly impossable or highly tedious due to extreme securatay meausres.
the likely hood of anything happening is slim - yes if we brought down securaty it would be possible for that to rise, but why not stay as we are/were?
there are moer deaths because of other things such as illness and car accidents than there are terrorist attacks and so shouldnt our government focus on them too? the only reason that the govrenment focus on terrorists is because if they didnt they would probably lose their job. and terrorist attacks visibly hit our country and kill many people in one go..though - similar numbers of people (if not more in some cases) die per day than in one attack..but because the number of people jsut dyeing is spread out over the country it doesn't matter!?
im not saying we should forget securaty and allow such terrorists and their attacks but i think we are spending too much time and money worrying about something that is so unlikely and trying to develop ways to prevent attacks by using methods that can be just as easily bypassed!
/ –
