Shoutbox

quote:

---

Originally posted by Val
Hey, you're the same guy from the translation thread! I wonder who you want to rate negatively. Just because you got a little butt hurt from being proved wrong and exposing the fact that you are an idiot, doesn't mean we will change the reputation system for you.

---

Look, I respect the people who didn't allow me to become a translator, I'll wait some time, I didn't want to rate them, I wanted to rate this person who, in another thread a user was rude, and becaise of this user's additude, I wanted to rate the user.

quote:

---

Originally posted by androo123

quote:

---

Originally posted by Val
Hey, you're the same guy from the translation thread! I wonder who you want to rate negatively. Just because you got a little butt hurt from being proved wrong and exposing the fact that you are an idiot, doesn't mean we will change the reputation system for you.

---

Look, I respect the people who didn't allow me to become a translator, I'll wait some time, I didn't want to rate them, I wanted to rate this person who, in another thread a user was rude, and becaise of this user's additude, I wanted to rate the user.

---

Really, i have a feeling your making this up. What was the comment and post?

look up you pleb. =/

oh, found it did you john-t?

quote:

---

Originally posted by icd*
look up you pleb. =/

oh, found it did you john-t?

---

Eh?

Look up?

oh sorry, im making things up. had i known i owould have made a pdf screenshot.

quote:

---

Originally posted by icd*
oh sorry, im making things up. had i known i owould have made a pdf screenshot.

---

I asked what the very rude comment was?

quote:

---

Originally posted by Willz
I find it to be fine the way it is as people with less than 100 posts wouldn't know how people act in the community overall so a new person might just negative vote out of vengeance just for being flamed about a stupid thread or coming to a forum and expecting things to change because of their arrival.

This isn't even worth voting for because it's not going to change, move along citizens.

---

I just wanna say one thing. The post count does NOT equal to how observant and experienced the user is. Sure, a lot of the time it does, but a lot of the time it doesn't. There are people who have been around for ages, who are mature and who know most of the regulars here and yet have quite few posts. And at the same time some people just post more and have hundreds or even thousands of posts but they still remain amazingly ignorant about how these forums work and who these people here are. That's why I have personally always objected to this idea of linking the post count to experience. I don't really care if the 100 posts limit gets changed or not, I just hate seeing this misconception constantly coming up.

I don't dig the rep system anyway.

If anything, simply a "Was this post helpful or not?" type thing for everyone to access.

But on a forum such as this, it wouldn't work - it's more a community rather than something like MSDN forums.

Why are we still discussing it? Wdz has made it clear in the past that nothing was going to change. There's no reason to change it, so leave it alone. It has been discussed way too many times. Nothing will come out of another discussion. NOTHING.

http://shoutbox.menthix.net/showthread.php?tid=83998

quote:

---

Originally posted by .Lou
Nothing will come out of another discussion. NOTHING.

---

In fact... according to the poll results...

quote:

---

Originally posted by poll

Yes, users with lower than 100 votes should be allowed to vote for a person's reputation >  vote
No, users with lower than 100 votes should not be allowed to vote for a person's repuation > 31votes

---

Nothing is gonna change.