Shoutbox

Menthix's Post:

quote:

---

Originally posted by MenthiX
Bad idea, people seem only to write stupid things there anyway.

---

People need to be sensible for a system to work like this, either way it is setup.

quote:

---

Originally posted by MenthiX
True, that's why i don't really belive in per-post anymore.

---

There are limits on the amount of reputations a user can give per day.

quote:

---

Originally posted by MenthiX
I think that if you can give comments along with your vote the reputation thing should not be anonymously, this to avoid problems which we already saw today. If a vote is done without any comment i don't care it it is anonymous or not.

---

All votes should be anonymous (maybe make an option to allow the user giving the reputation to decide whether or not to show who gave it?).. Making them all public will probably cause fights as users will see who gave who a bad reputation.

---

Johnny:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Johnny_Mac
1) I'm not too sure on forum staff members actually having a reputation. From a newbie point of view you come along and see a mod has a poor reputation; what is that going to make you think of them as a mod?

---

I would have to agree on that.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Johnny_Mac
2) If more usergroups who can vote are added, then whats to stop ganging up on one another.

---

Thats another thing that need to be looked into, i can see this happening.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Johnny_Mac
3) Moderators/admins are more prone to being given negative ratings as they are likely to become unpopular for locking topics, deleting posts, warning other members.

---

Agreed. Like the negative reputation WDZ gave me.

Now to go through and read the rest of the thread again.