quote:
Originally posted by CookieRevised
you can easly conclude that they don't like each other
Better avoid having humans *thinking*. Let PHP do the work
.
quote:
Originally posted by CookieRevised
IMO, more negative votes will be given (spam) then positive ones, because most "good" posts are neutral, hence the reputation system isn't that reliable...
IMO, if you make public ratings, there won't be that many negative rates. And we were talking about trusted users who might rate. Not 13375 who will rate out of rage.
Suggestion: If you want to make it for everyone, and you want to control all those maybe not very accurate POST-rates. Give the members the option to report rates! (permitting max. 4 reports per user/week). And let Elites (
) moderate them (if a wrong reputation has been spotted, it will be deleted or made neutral; neutral votes also work for post-rating
).
And as countermeasure: an extra-negative point for the author of that moderated reputation. (only elites would know who are the voters if anonymous).
This way Elites would have something to do (
) and perhaps more elites are needed
(this goes in order to avoid:
More open to abuse: if a voter hates a certain poster, he/she could give negative reputations to many of the poster's posts.)
Reputation: users or posts?
/ –
