quote:
Originally posted by matty
American's keep making the same mistakes... first they re-elect a Bush... now a woman is running... can your economy really withstand that lol
Hillary and George have 2 things in common... they both got bush and will both fail.
Actually I think Hillary would be the best democractic nominee for president, especially when it comes to the economy. I personally think she would do wonders to bring our economy back up and get us out of this recession.
And just curious, why couldn't a women run America? I don't believe it's simply a "mans" job. Looking at present and past situations with our presidents, I think it's safe to say it'll be better to have a women as our president because A) War is not the first solution B) They have a reputable open mind.
quote:
Originally posted by ZrednaZ
I don't think that voting against going to war and subsequently voting to fund a war in progress contradicting. Not doing so would be like not accepting the facts of reality: the US has started a war and should be obligated to finish is properly.
My country, Denmark, started the war along with the United States and the UK, yet it has withdrawn from it very recently. I don't know who we think we are - forcing someone else to clean up a mess we helped create. 
omg, Obama's against gay marriage? That's so silly - he just lost my respect. 
I'm voting for the Democrats (preferably Hillary) although I know, as a Texan voter, it will be a complete waste of my time because of the stupid Electoral College system. 
I however, do find it contradicting because Obama made a
public statement stating he
will not vote to go to war, and publicly stated he
will not fund the war. Then going on and voting to fund it, then not to fund it, and then to fund it? Come on now, what would he do in a real situation if he were president? To declair war with North Korea, and then to cancel it two days later? America would be doomed, more so than it already is at current state.
/ 
