What happened to the Messenger Plus! forums on msghelp.net?
Shoutbox » MsgHelp Archive » General » General Chit Chat » Star Trek

Star Trek
Author: Message:
CookieRevised
Elite Member
*****

Avatar

Posts: 15519
Reputation: 173
– / Male / Flag
Joined: Jul 2003
Status: Away
RE: Star Trek
Film size is only one part of the story... screen size is another... viewing distance yet another... If you have a bigger resolution, you can have a bigger screen, but you also sit further away from it.

The point of IMAX is so you can have really big screen sizes with one projector and a lot more people can watch the movie at the same time. For that you must have a bigger resolution. But if the screen size doesn't go above those extra large screens there is no point in having a bigger resolution either.

A standard IMAX screen is 'only' like 15m high but you sit a lot further away than from a 'normal' screen of 8m high (unless you want to do some gymnastics while watching or miss half of the movie). The viewing experience, including the viewing angle, is in the end almost exactly the same.

PS: The entire official point of IMAX _IS_ screen size. That's the only reason why it was 'invented' already several decades ago. Image Maxima, maximum screensize...


going offtopic I think...

This post was edited on 05-24-2009 at 05:46 PM by CookieRevised.
.-= A 'frrrrrrrituurrr' for Wacky =-.
05-24-2009 05:41 PM
Profile PM Find Quote Report
« Next Oldest Return to Top Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread
Star Trek - by Patchou on 05-08-2009 at 03:33 PM
RE: Star Trek - by ipab on 05-08-2009 at 03:38 PM
RE: Star Trek - by ixesha on 05-08-2009 at 06:56 PM
RE: Star Trek - by prashker on 05-08-2009 at 07:26 PM
RE: Star Trek - by Spunky on 05-08-2009 at 10:50 PM
RE: Star Trek - by Eddie on 05-09-2009 at 03:58 AM
RE: Star Trek - by Spunky on 05-09-2009 at 09:17 AM
RE: Star Trek - by Patchou on 05-09-2009 at 03:28 PM
RE: Star Trek - by -dt- on 05-09-2009 at 03:35 PM
RE: Star Trek - by stoshrocket on 05-10-2009 at 12:08 AM
RE: Star Trek - by Felu on 05-10-2009 at 03:01 AM
RE: Star Trek - by albert on 05-10-2009 at 02:46 PM
RE: RE: Star Trek - by ipab on 05-12-2009 at 04:32 AM
RE: Star Trek - by wacky on 05-12-2009 at 04:02 AM
RE: Star Trek - by John Anderton on 05-12-2009 at 04:18 AM
RE: Star Trek - by Rolando on 05-12-2009 at 04:21 AM
RE: Star Trek - by -dt- on 05-12-2009 at 04:22 AM
RE: Star Trek - by wacky on 05-12-2009 at 02:22 PM
RE: Star Trek - by Patchou on 05-12-2009 at 08:37 PM
RE: Star Trek - by prashker on 05-12-2009 at 08:41 PM
RE: Star Trek - by wacky on 05-12-2009 at 08:50 PM
RE: RE: Star Trek - by Patchou on 05-12-2009 at 10:30 PM
RE: Star Trek - by Vilkku on 05-12-2009 at 09:18 PM
RE: Star Trek - by MeEtc on 05-13-2009 at 01:12 AM
RE: Star Trek - by prashker on 05-13-2009 at 02:37 AM
RE: Star Trek - by ipab on 05-13-2009 at 06:06 AM
RE: Star Trek - by John Anderton on 05-13-2009 at 09:09 AM
RE: Star Trek - by wacky on 05-13-2009 at 03:03 PM
RE: Star Trek - by ixesha on 05-13-2009 at 07:33 PM
RE: Star Trek - by djdannyp on 05-14-2009 at 05:55 AM
RE: RE: Star Trek - by Patchou on 05-15-2009 at 09:01 PM
RE: Star Trek - by John Anderton on 05-14-2009 at 06:44 AM
RE: Star Trek - by vaccination on 05-14-2009 at 08:41 AM
RE: Star Trek - by prashker on 05-15-2009 at 09:28 PM
RE: Star Trek - by Patchou on 05-16-2009 at 04:49 PM
RE: Star Trek - by toto69230 on 05-23-2009 at 11:38 AM
RE: Star Trek - by John Anderton on 05-24-2009 at 08:03 AM
RE: Star Trek - by CookieRevised on 05-24-2009 at 04:00 PM
RE: Star Trek - by ShawnZ on 05-24-2009 at 04:45 PM
RE: Star Trek - by prashker on 05-24-2009 at 04:55 PM
RE: Star Trek - by CookieRevised on 05-24-2009 at 05:12 PM
RE: Star Trek - by ShawnZ on 05-24-2009 at 05:27 PM
RE: Star Trek - by Menthix on 05-24-2009 at 05:41 PM
RE: Star Trek - by CookieRevised on 05-24-2009 at 05:41 PM
RE: Star Trek - by ShawnZ on 05-24-2009 at 05:54 PM
RE: Star Trek - by CookieRevised on 05-24-2009 at 06:11 PM
RE: Star Trek - by ShawnZ on 05-24-2009 at 06:23 PM
RE: Star Trek - by Rolando on 05-24-2009 at 06:51 PM
RE: Star Trek - by John Anderton on 05-25-2009 at 02:03 AM
RE: Star Trek - by prashker on 05-25-2009 at 02:41 AM
RE: Star Trek - by ixesha on 05-27-2009 at 12:08 PM


Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
View a Printable Version
Send this Thread to a Friend
Subscribe | Add to Favorites
Rate This Thread:

Forum Jump:

Forum Rules:
You cannot post new threads
You cannot post replies
You cannot post attachments
You can edit your posts
HTML is Off
myCode is On
Smilies are On
[img] Code is On