quote:
You can't easily and accurately rate such an evolution.
Because you don't need to. You need to rate the current behaviour, not ALL of the past behaviours (i.e. the evolution). I just say "He is now being more helpful than before, so good for him
" or "He's become more and more annoying. He lies all the time".
*
When you think of whether you like or not someone in "real" life, you don't think about every single word he/she has said to you, you just have an instant opinion of his/her personality.
*
quote:
Another thing I want to say, a disadvantage of current user-rating system:
The more voters for a certain user the harder a rate is really relevant.
The comments are supplementary, remember you still have a reputation rating: if WDZ has
25 it means he's a good guy. I don't see where rates are irrelevant. Per post ratings are much more irrelevant, since you can't change, you can just add.
Reputation: users or posts?
/ 
