Shoutbox

tbh, thats a stupid way of doing the ratings ~_~.

Latest Reputations Received (Reputation: -6)
  Post Date Received Comments
N/A - Been Deleted Yesterday at 06:02 AM fuck you mother fucker
N/A - Been Deleted 04-24-2004 at 10:45 PM Hmm... dodgy useless post

Anyone else liked my suggestion though ? (my head's still warm and steaming )

KeyStorm: I'm still thinking about it... it certainly has advantages...

That would be nice if some other people commented on it... or maybe they don't understand yet...

quote:

---

Originally posted by eXoenDo
tbh, thats a stupid way of doing the ratings ~_~.

---

Well, this is a suggestion thread... have any?

I still think that the best solution is the Ebay one. Vote per user, positive, neutral or negative (default is neutral) with a comment. This can be changed at any time, and anyone can view all the comments sent to a user as you can see a seller/buyer's rating at ebay.

Here I made sample screenshots and all:
http://shoutbox.menthix.net/showthread.php?tid=20...d=189947#pid189947

Suggestion: Users over a Certain Number of Posts (200, 400, 600, etc.) can vote, instead of just usergroups.

Edit: I like Guido's idea.  Although WDZ is not "my idol". ¬_¬

quote:

---

Originally posted by eXoenDo
Suggestion: Users over a Certain Number of Posts (200, 400, 600, etc.) can vote, instead of just usergroups.

---

I might make that possible with the new system... we'll have a separate thread to discuss it.

Well, I don't see the problem in Rating by posts .
Although Guido's suggestion is ok, it's just a nifty UI with a simple rating system behind (sabes que no es nada personal contra ti ).
If we could combine somehow both suggestions...

Btw, I have some more ideas:
-Make it optional to show the name when you vote.
-Being able to modify the Reputation points given to someone
-The value of each vote would change with each group jump of the voter (even already given points would change their value).
-Show a little bar like this: (I know it looks very crappy, but it's just an example) (1st: 50% of the maximal good reputation possible; 2nd: maximal good reputation; 3rd: 50% of maximal bad reputation possible)

quote:

---

Originally posted by KeyStorm
-Make it optional to show the name when you vote.

---

Yeah, I already had that in mind... you could choose whether or not to be anonymous.

quote:

---

Originally posted by KeyStorm
-Being able to modify the Reputation points given to someone

---

What? Change your own votes? Or change other peoples' votes?

quote:

---

Originally posted by KeyStorm
-The value of each vote would change with each group jump of the voter (even already given points would change their value).

---

"Group jump"?

quote:

---

Originally posted by KeyStorm
-Show a little bar like this: (I know it looks very crappy, but it's just an example) (1st: 50% of the maximal good reputation possible; 2nd: maximal good reputation; 3rd: 50% of maximal bad reputation possible)

---

How do you know the maximums? Number of voters multiplied by their voting power? That wouldn't work well if regular users were allowed to vote, or the staff/elites were changing... it would have to keep track of the number of voters...

-Ywah, I meant modifying the votes (you already thought about it )

-Hope you got the thing that the value of votes already given would change when a member changed the group.

-And yeah, you should know the maximums, why not?

quote:

---

Originally posted by WDZ
What? Change your own votes? Or change other peoples' votes?

---

I think he means, if you're admin for example, whether you'd like to give 1, 2 or 3 points.